U.S. Code » Title 40 » Subtitle SUBTITLE III— INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT › Chapter CHAPTER 113— RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACQUISITIONS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— DIRECTOR OF OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

40 U.S.C. § 102

DEFINITIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 40 CasesGoogle Scholar
“In this Act [probably means “this title”]—“(1) the term ‘Administrator’ means the Administrator of General Services;“(2) the term ‘agency’ has the meaning given the term in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code;“(3) the term ‘AI CoE’ means the AI Center of Excellence described in section 103;“(4) the term ‘artificial intelligence’ has the meaning given the term in section 238(g) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note);“(5) the term ‘Director’ means the Director of the Office of Management and Budget;“(6) the term ‘institution of higher education’ has the meaning given the term in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001); and“(7) the term ‘nonprofit organization’ means an organization described in section 501(c)(3)of [sic] the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)] and exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of that Code [26 U.S.C. 501(a)].
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2005–2024 · leading case: Bradford v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 101 F.4th 707 (10th Cir. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bradford v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 101 F.4th 707 (10th Cir. 2024). · cites it 2× “” 40 U.S.C. § 102 (8). The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which heads of agencies—including the Administrator of General Services—promulgated pursuant to authority granted under FPASA, see 48 C.”
Terry v. United States, 96 Fed. Cl. 131 (Fed. Cl. 2010). · cites it 2× “0 (c) (2009); accord 40 U.S.C. § 102 (5) (2006) (containing a similar definition).”
Shawnee Tribe v. United States, 405 F.3d 1121 (10th Cir. 2005). “” 40 U.S.C. § 102 (3) (2002). By contrast, the "term 'surplus property’ means excess property that the [General Services] Administrator determines is not required to meet the needs or responsibilities of all federal agencies.”
Nat'l Law Ctr. On, Homelessness & Poverty v. United States Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 931 F. Supp. 2d 167 (D.D.C. 2013). · cites it 2× “” 40 U.S.C. § 102 (3); see also 42 U.S.C. § 11411 (i)(2) (adopting definition).”
Shawnee Tribe v. United States, 423 F.3d 1204 (10th Cir. 2005). “” 40 U.S.C. § 102 (3) (2002). By contrast, the “term 'surplus property' means excess property that the [General Services] Administrator determines is not required to meet the needs or responsibilities of all federal agencies.”
Tektel, Inc. v. United States, 116 Fed. Cl. 612 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “judicial branch of the Government----” 40 U.S.C. § 102 (5) (2006). According to GSA, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts and the federal courts were not federal agencies within the executive branch of the government, but were authorized as “other federal…”
Microgenics Corp. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2021). · cites it 5× “§ 451 ,” namely 40 U.S.C. § 102 (5). Pl.’s Resp. at 7-8. However, “this court, unlike .”
Bradford v. U.S. Dep't of Labor (D. Colo. 2022). · cites it 3× “Although the Procurement Act defines “property” narrowly, as plaintiffs note, see 40 U.S.C. § 102 (9), plaintiff’s argument is not persuasive because the Procurement Act also covers “supplying .”
Natl. Coalition v. Va (D.D.C. 2013). · cites it 2× “” 40 U.S.C. § 102 (3); see also 42 U.S.C. § 11411 (i)(2) (adopting definition).”
Disposition of Proceeds From the Sale of Real Prop. Acquired With Money From the Soc. Sec. Trust Funds (OLC 2010). “” 40 U.S.C. § 102 (3); see also id. § 524(a)(2) (requiring each executive agency subject to the Act to “continuously survey property under its control to identify excess property”).”
Disposition of Proceeds from the Sale of Gov't Bldgs. Acquired with Soc. Sec. Trust Funds (OLC 2010). “” 40 U.S.C. § 102 (3); see also id. § 524(a)(2) (requiring each executive agency subject to the Act to “continuously survey property under its control to identify excess property”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.