40 U.S.C. § 6102
Regulations
Historical and Revision Notes | ||
|---|---|---|
Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
6102 | 40:13l. | Aug. 18, 1949, ch. 479, § 7, 63 Stat. 617; Pub. L. 97–390, § 1(b), Dec. 29, 1982, 96 Stat. 1957. |
In subsection (a), before clause (1), the word “are” is substituted for “may be deemed” for clarity. In clause (1), the word “individuals” is substituted for “persons” for clarity.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2013–2017 · leading case: Hodge v. Talkin, 949 F. Supp. 2d 152 (D.D.C. 2013).
Hodge v. Talkin, 949 F. Supp. 2d 152 (D.D.C. 2013). “See 40 U.S.C. § 6102 . Third, and relatedly, if the Court were to rewrite this statute — for example, to impose on it an “intent” requirement that does not currently exist, or to limit the statute’s reach to activity that actually impedes on ingress and egress, or to impose on…”
United States v. Bronstein, 151 F. Supp. 3d 31 (D.D.C. 2015). “It, is worth noting that this construction of the Uttering Clause overlaps considerably— perhaps entirely — with Regulation Five of the Supreme Court's Building Regulations; 40 U.S.C. § 6102 (a)(2) authorizes the Marshal of the Supreme Court, with the approval of the Chief…”
United States v. Saffle, 151 F. Supp. 3d 31 (D.D.C. 2015). “40 U.S.C. § 6102 (a)(2) authorizes the Marshal of the Supreme Court, with the approval of the Chief Justice, to prescribe regulations “that are necessary for .”
Miska v. Talkin (D.D.C. 2017). “On June 13, 2013, the United States Supreme Court promulgated Regulation 7, which reads: This regulation is issued under the authority of 40 U.S.C. § 6102 to protect the Supreme Court building and grounds, and persons and property thereon, and to maintain suitable order and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.