41 U.S.C. § 3507

Interest and penalties for certain overpayments

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 41 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)In General.—If the Federal Government makes an overpayment to a contractor under a contract with an executive agency subject to this chapter and the overpayment was due to the submission by the contractor of defective cost or pricing data, the contractor shall be liable to the Federal Government—(1) for interest on the amount of the overpayment, to be computed—(A) for the period beginning on the date the overpayment was made to the contractor and ending on the date the contractor repays the amount of the overpayment to the Federal Government; and(B) at the current rate prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury under section 6621 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 6621); and(2) if the submission of the defective data was a knowing submission, for an additional amount equal to the amount of the overpayment.(b)Liability Not Affected by Refusal To Submit Certification.—Any liability under this section of a contractor that submits cost or pricing data but refuses to submit the certification required by section 3502(b) of this title with respect to the cost or pricing data is not affected by the refusal to submit the certification.(Pub. L. 111–350, § 3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3769.)

Historical and Revision Notes
3507	41:254b(f).	June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, § 304A(f), as added Pub. L. 103–355, title I, § 1251(a)(2), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3283.

Historical and Revision Notes

3507

41:254b(f).

June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title III, § 304A(f), as added Pub. L. 103–355, title I, § 1251(a)(2), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3283.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2020–2020 · leading case: McNeil v. Yale Univ. (D. Conn. 2020).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

McNeil v. Yale Univ. (D. Conn. 2020). “e Fraternity Defendants argue that Plaintiffs’ Fair Housing Act claim must fail because there is no allegation in the Second Amended Complaint “that any Plaintiff ever applied or attempted to apply for housing with any of the Fraternity Defendants” and that, even had they been…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.