42 U.S.C. § 10604
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1993–2004 · leading case: State v. Kalakosky, 852 P.2d 1064 (Wash. 1993).
State v. Kalakosky, 852 P.2d 1064 (Wash. 1993). “) The rape crisis center appeared through its attorney and argued that 42 U.S.C. § 10604 (d) establishes an absolute privilege for such notes.”
Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States, 60 Fed. Cl. 611 (Fed. Cl. 2004). “§ 3789g(a) (2000) (certain public health information "shall be immune from legal process, and shall not, without the consent of the person furnishing such information, be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any action, suit, or other judicial, legislative, or…”
Smith v. Smith, 37 Va. Cir. 267 (Loudoun Cir. Ct. 1995). “Although several grounds are stated in the Motion to Quash, only the argument arising out of 42 U.S.C. § 10604 (d) was persuasive. All the other grounds stated in the Motion to Quash were rejected.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.