U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 112— VICTIM COMPENSATION AND ASSISTANCE

42 U.S.C. § 10606

Repealed. Pub. L. 108–405, title I, § 102(c), Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2264

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2023 · leading case: United States v. McElhaney, 54 M.J. 120 (C.A.A.F. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. McElhaney, 54 M.J. 120 (C.A.A.F. 2000). · cites it 2× “In Spann , we declined to apply § 502 of the Victims’ Rights and Restitution Act of 1990, 42 USC § 10606 to courts-martial (expressing a preference for a victim’s presence in the courtroom at trial).”
United States v. Spann, 51 M.J. 89 (C.A.A.F. 1999). · cites it 7× “On appellant’s petition, we granted review of the following issue: WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED WHEN HE APPLIED THE CONGRESSIONALLY-PASSED “VICTIM OF CRIME BILL OF RIGHTS,” 42 USC § 10606 . We hold that the military judge erred but that the error was harmless under the…”
United States v. Rorie, 58 M.J. 399 (C.A.A.F. 2003). · cites it 3× “42 U.S.C. § 10606 (2000). Subsequent to this Court’s decisions in Kuskie and Berry, the Department of Defense revised Dep’t of Defense, Directive 1030.”
Daugherty v. United States, 212 F. Supp. 2d 1279 (N.D. Okla. 2002). · cites it 6× “The right to restitution in 42 U.S.C. § 10606 appears in the context of sentencing a convicted criminal under 18 U.”
Saum v. Widnall, 912 F. Supp. 1384 (D. Colo. 1996). · cites it 3× “As Saum defines her relief, she seeks: (1) a declaratory judgment that her constitutional rights have been violated and restitution therefor; (2) a declaratory judgment that she is a “crime victim” as defined by 42 U.S.C. § 10606 and DOD Instruction No.”
United States v. Croxford, 324 F. Supp. 2d 1230 (D. Utah 2004). “42 U.S.C. § 10606 (b)(5) & (1); see also United States v.”
United States v. Wayne Whittaker, 268 F.3d 185 (3rd Cir. 2001). “On January 29, 2001, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 10606 and 10607, Reed signed a letter addressed to approximately 300 people who owned cars that were dismantled in the chop shops to advise them of the progress of the investigation and to invite them to file victim impact statements…”
United States v. Bedonie, 317 F. Supp. 2d 1285 (D. Utah 2004). “at 1268 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 10606 (b)). 9 . See Order Rejecting Timing Objections to Appointment of an Expert on Restitution, United States v.”
United States v. Turner, 367 F. Supp. 2d 319 (E.D.N.Y 2005). “See 42 U.S.C. § 10606 (b). But unlike previous reforms, the CVRA gives crime victims direct standing to vindicate their procedural and substantive rights in criminal cases independently of prosecutors, see 18 U.”
W.P. v. Poritz, 931 F. Supp. 1199 (D.N.J. 1996). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 10606 (b)(7), 10607(c)(3)(E) and (G), (c)(5)(A) and (B).”
United States v. Serawop, 303 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (D. Utah 2004). · cites it 3× “42 U.S.C. § 10606 (a). 45 . 42 U.S.C. § 10606 (b)(5).”
Daugherty v. United States, 73 F. App'x 326 (10th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2× “Appellants raise four issues on appeal: (1) whether Captain Toennies had statutory authority to exercise command functions over Commander Daugherty; (2) whether Captain Toennies acted within the scope of his employment in issuing commands that allegedly harmed the plaintiffs;…”
Show all 29 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.