42 U.S.C. § 10607
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case: United States v. Daryl Lawrence, 735 F.3d 385 (6th Cir. 2013).
United States v. Daryl Lawrence, 735 F.3d 385 (6th Cir. 2013). “” Section 3510(c) defines “victim” as including all persons defined as victims in 42 U.S.C. § 10607 (e)(2). Section 10607(e)(2), in turn, defines “victim” as “a person that has suffered direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the commission of a crime.”
United States v. Visinaiz, 428 F.3d 1300 (10th Cir. 2005). “” 42 U.S.C. § 10607 (e)(2) (emphasis supplied); see also 18 U.”
United States v. Gary Lee Sampson, 486 F.3d 13 (1st Cir. 2007). “§ 3510 (b); 42 U.S.C. § 10607 (e)(2)(B). Despite these obvious obstacles, Sampson asserts that, in this case, the victims’ families’ ongoing reactions to the evidence presented were unfairly prejudicial.”
United States v. Martin Sigillito, 759 F.3d 913 (8th Cir. 2014). “” 42 U.S.C. § 10607 (c)(3)(A),(F). Sigillito fails to provide any authority or argument that compliance with this statutory requirement violates his due-process rights.”
United States v. David James Ward, 131 F.3d 335 (3rd Cir. 1997). “1796 , 1945-50 (codified in part at 42 U.S.C. §§ 10607 (c), 14011 (1995)), the All Writs Act, 28 U.”
United States v. Turner, 367 F. Supp. 2d 319 (E.D.N.Y 2005). “2 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 10607 (b)(1)). Although requiring the government to file a list of victims does not, for the reasons described above, appear to impose a burden the government does not already bear, it may engender some serious risks to others.”
United States v. Atl. States Cast Iron Pipe Co., 612 F. Supp. 2d 453 (D.N.J. 2009). “§ 3771(f) (procedures to promote compliance); 42 U.S.C. § 10607 (services to victims). There are two primary innovations embodied in the CVRA.”
Kelley v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 67 F. Supp. 3d 240 (D.D.C. 2014). “”); 42 U.S.C. § 10607 (d) (2012) (“This section does not create a cause of action or defense in favor of any person arising out of the failure of a responsible person to provide information as required by subsection (b) or (c) of this section.”
United States v. Serawop, 303 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (D. Utah 2004). “42 U.S.C. § 10607 (c)(1)(B) (emphases added).”
Saum v. Widnall, 912 F. Supp. 1384 (D. Colo. 1996). “She maintains defendants’ failure to comply with or to enforce Air Force rules and regulations prohibiting such treatment, and failure after she reported the events at SERE either to enforce certain punitive arti- *1387 eles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) or to…”
United States v. Brown, 40 M.J. 625 (1994). “4789 , 4806, 4820 (codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 10607 , 13031 (Supp. IV 1992)); see also Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982, Pub.”
United States v. Gordon, 334 F. Supp. 2d 581 (D. Del. 2004). “”); 42 U.S.C. § 10607 (e)(2) (for purposes of “services to victims” statute, “the term ‘victim’ means a person that has suffered direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the commission of a crime”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.