42 U.S.C. § 13925
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 2010–2019 · leading case: Hively v. Ivy Tech Cmty. Coll. of Indiana, 853 F.3d 339 (7th Cir. 2017).
Hively v. Ivy Tech Cmty. Coll. of Indiana, 853 F.3d 339 (7th Cir. 2017). “” 42 U.S.C. § 13925 (b)(13)(A) (emphases added).”
United States v. Castleman, 134 S. Ct. 1405 (2014). “§ 1304 (a)(2) ("The term 'domestic violence' means violence committed by a current or former spouse or" other qualifying relation); 42 U.S.C.A. § 13925 (a)(8) (Sept. 2013 Supp.”
Franciscan All., Inc. v. Burwell, 227 F. Supp. 3d 660 (N.D. Tex. 2016). “See 42 U.S.C. § 13925 (b)(13)(A) (specifically addressing both sex and gender identity, declaring: “No person .”
Bedoya-Melendez v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 680 F.3d 1321 (11th Cir. 2012). “In 2006, Congress added § 40002 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 13925 ) to the Violence Against Women Act.”
United States v. State of North Carolina, 192 F. Supp. 3d 620 (M.D.N.C. 2016). “Schroeder, United States District Judge Before the court is a joint motion to enjoin the automatic suspension of certain federal funds made available to Defendants pursuant to the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 20Í3, 42 U.S.C. § 13925 (b)(13) (“VAWA”), pending…”
Bd. of Educ. v. United States Dep't of Educ., 208 F. Supp. 3d 850 (S.D. Ohio 2016). “Nor is the Court persuaded by Highland’s attempts to glean the meaning of sex from Congress’s inaction, specifically its failure to amend Title VII or Title IX to insert the phrase "gender identity” in contrast with its decision to add this phrase to the Violenoe Against Women…”
Matter of Johnson v. Palumbo, 2017 NY Slip Op 6534 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017). “We consider whether, under these circumstances, the petitioner was entitled to the housing protections of the Violence Against Women Act (hereinafter the VAWA; 42 USC § 13925 et seq., transferred to 34 USC § 12291 et seq.”
Carcaño v. McCrory, 315 F.R.D. 176 (M.D.N.C. 2016). “th Carolina Department of Public Safety (“NCDPS”), the University of North Carolina, and the University of North Carolina Board of Governors, seeking a declaration that compliance with HB2’s provisions relating to multiple-occupancy bathrooms and changing facilities constitutes…”
Richardson v. Sexual Assault/Spouse Abuse Rsch. Ctr., Inc., 270 F.R.D. 223 (D. Maryland 2010). “Defendants argue that the Violence Against Women Act (“VAWA”), 42 U.S.C. § 13925 (b)(2); Md.Code Ann., Health-Gen.”
Bos. Hous. Auth. v. Y.A., 121 N.E.3d 1237 (Mass. 2019). “, 42 U.S.C. §§ 13925 , 14043e et seq. (2012 & Supp.”
Whether the Crim. Provisions of the Violence Against Women Act Apply to Otherwise Covered Conduct When the Offender & Victim Are the Same Sex (OLC 2010). “It is true that the statute is entitled the Violence Against Women Act, but other provisions of the Act make clear it applies to conduct perpetrated against male, as well as female, victims, see, e.”
Application of the Violence Against Women Act When the Offender & Victim Are the Same Sex (OLC 2010). “The plain meaning of the term encompasses individuals of both sexes, regardless of their relationship to the offender, and nothing in the text or the structure or purpose of VAWA indicates that a departure from plain meaning would be appropriate. It is true that the statute is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.