42 U.S.C. § 1395
Prohibition against any Federal interference
Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to authorize any Federal officer or employee to exercise any supervision or control over the practice of medicine or the manner in which medical services are provided, or over the selection, tenure, or compensation of any officer or employee of any institution, agency, or person providing health services; or to exercise any supervision or control over the administration or operation of any such institution, agency, or person.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1,902
cases (200 in the last 5 years), 1968–2026 · leading case: Am. Hosp. Ass'n v. Azar, 348 F. Supp. 3d 62 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
Am. Hosp. Ass'n v. Azar, 348 F. Supp. 3d 62 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395 - 1395 lll . Medicare Part A provides insurance coverage for inpatient hospital care, home health care, and hospice services.”
McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc., 21 P.3d 1189 (Cal. 2001). “( 42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq.) As will appear, some disagreement exists among state and federal courts on this question, which has not yet been addressed by the United States Supreme Court.”
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Ctr. & Rsch. Inst. Hosp., Inc. v. Azar, 324 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “Subsection (t)(2)(E) also provides HHS a broad discretionary authority to make "adjustments" to those rates: [T]he Secretary shall establish, in a budget neutral manner, outlier adjustments under paragraph (5) and transitional pass-through payments under paragraph (6) and other…”
Am. Hosp. Ass'n v. Azar, 385 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395 - 1395 lll . 3 Medicare Part A provides coverage for inpatient hospital care, home health care, and hospice services.”
Regions Hosp. v. Shalala, 522 U.S. 448 (1998). “I A Under the Medicare Act and its implementing regulations, 42 U. S. C. § 1395 et seq., the costs of certain educational programs for interns and residents, known as GME programs, are "allowable cost[s]" for which a hospital (a provider) may receive reimbursement.”
Am. Hosp. Ass'n v. Azar, 895 F.3d 822 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq. Part A of Medicare covers primarily inpatient hospital services, while Part B includes coverage for outpatient *824 hospital care.”
White v. Jubitz Corp., 219 P.3d 566 (Or. 2009). “42 U.S.C. §§ 1395 -1395hhh. In accordance with that federal law and the applicable formula for determining permitted payments, Medicare had paid plaintiff's medical providers a total of $13,400.”
Good Samaritan Hosp. v. Shalala, 508 U.S. 402 (1993). “291 , as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1395 et seq. Under the program, providers of health care services can enter into agreements with the Secretary of Health and Human Services pursuant to which they are reimbursed for certain costs associated with the treatment of Medicare…”
Shalala v. Guernsey Mem'l Hosp., 514 U.S. 87 (1995). “290 , as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1395 et seq., authorizes the Secretary to promulgate regulations "establishing the method or methods to be used" for determining reasonable costs, directing *92 her in the process to "consider, among other things, the principles generally applied…”
Lee Med., Inc. v. Paula Beecher, 312 S.W.3d 515 (Tenn. 2010). “lth care services rendered were professionally indicated, or were performed in compliance with the applicable standard of care, or that the cost of health care rendered was considered reasonable by the providers of professional health care services in the area and includes a…”
In Re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price Lit., 582 F.3d 156 (1st Cir. 2009). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395 l (a), 1395u(b); 42 C.F.”
Interim Healthcare, Inc. v. Spherion Corp., 884 A.2d 513 (Del. Super. Ct. 2005). “Medicare is a federally funded program created in 1966 by the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (the “Medicare statute”), to provide healthcare coverage for a designated population, including the elderly and disabled.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1395(dd)(a) — 1 case
Potami v. Frankel, 63 Pa. D. & C.4th 216 (2000).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1395(w) — 1 case
Molina Healthcare of California, Inc. v. United States, 133 Fed. Cl. 14 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1395(x)(v)(l)(L) — 1 case
Greater Dallas Home Care All. v. United States, 10 F. Supp. 2d 638 (N.D. Tex. 1998).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.