42 U.S.C. § 14131
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: United States v. Thomas Kriesel, Jr., 720 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2013).
United States v. Thomas Kriesel, Jr., 720 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2013). “42 U.S.C. § 14131 (a)(C)(2). Recommendations for these standards were to come from “an advisory board on DNA quality assurance methods from among nominations proposed by the head of the National Academy of Sciences and professional societies of crime laboratory officials.”
Jenkins v. State, 493 S.W.3d 583 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016). “42 U.S.C. § 14131 (a); see Rivera v. Mueller, 596 F.”
Powers v. State, 343 S.W.3d 36 (Tenn. 2011). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-30-310 provides that, when DNA testing is warranted, a court “shall select a laboratory that meets the standards adopted pursuant to the DNA Identification Act of 1994, 42 U.S.C. § 14131 et seq.,” a federal statutory provision that, among…”
State v. Traylor, 656 N.W.2d 885 (Minn. 2003). “at 2068 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 14131 (a)(1)-(3)). The Act provided that DAB was to exist for five years but gave the Director the authority to extend the duration of the board if necessary.”
People v. Buza, 413 P.3d 1132 (Cal. 2018). “1001 ; see also 42 U.S.C. §§ 14131 (a), 14135a.) The court "[took] account of these technical advances" ( King , at p.”
Phillips v. State, 152 A.3d 712 (Md. 2017). “” 42 U.S.C. § 14131 (a) (1994). This legislation also provided that, “[u]ntil such time as the advisory board has made recommendations to the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Director has acted upon those recommendations, the quality assurance guidelines…”
State v. Traylor, 641 N.W.2d 335 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). “42 U.S.C. § 14131 (a)(1)(C). The director of the FBI would then be directed to take the DAB recommendations into account when issuing the actual FBI standards.”
State v. Bander, 208 P.3d 1242 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “" 42 U.S.C. §§ 14131 (a)(1)(C), 14131(a)(3).”
Young v. United States, 63 A.3d 1033 (D.C. 2013). “The DNA Identification Act of 1994, 42 U.S.C. §§ 14131 -14136e (2006), also restricts access to the NDIS database.”
United States v. Lowe, 954 F. Supp. 401 (D. Mass. 1997). “The DNA Identification Act of 1994, 42 U.S.C. § 14131 (a) (“the Act”) established the DNA Advisory Board for the purpose of overseeing the setting of national DNA criteria for quality assurance and proficiency tests to be applied to various types of DNA analyses used by forensic…”
People v. Peppers, 817 N.E.2d 1152 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “All 50 states and the federal government (see 42 U.S.C. §§ 14131 through 14134 (2000)) have some type of DNA collection statute that requires some or all convicted felons to submit a tissue sample — blood, saliva, or other — for DNA profile analysis and storage in the DNA…”
Doe v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 794 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “The DNA Identification Act of 1994, 42 U.S.C. § 14131 et seq. (“Act”), authorizes the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) to establish and maintain the National DNA Identification System (“NDIS”).”
— 42 U.S.C. § 14131(a) — 1 case
USA v. Anthony Shea (D.N.H. 1997).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.