Notes of Decisions
Charles C. Haffner III & the N. Trust Co. v. United States, 757 F.2d 920 (7th Cir. 1985).
· cites it 2× “On cross motions for summary judgment the district court, in a detailed and well reasoned opinion, held that the Project Notes were exempt from federal estate taxes under section 11(b) of the Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. § 1437i(b). Haffner v. United States, 585 F.”
Hertel v. Bank of Am. N.A., 897 F. Supp. 2d 579 (W.D. Mich. 2012).
“” 42 U.S.C. § 1437i(b). Despite this exemption, the Court permitted the United States to enforce its estate tax against these notes.”
Hennepin Cnty. v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 933 F. Supp. 2d 1173 (D. Minn. 2013).
“In analyzing the statute, the Court explained: Well before the Housing Act was passed, an exemption of property from all taxation had an understood meaning: the property was exempt from direct taxation, but certain privileges of ownership, such as the right to transfer the…”
Haffner v. United States, 585 F. Supp. 354 (N.D. Ill. 1984).
“12% project note due 5/11/79 Although listing the Project Notes on Schedule B, the executors stated that they were not taxable, relying on section 11(b) *356 of the Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. § 1437i(b) (“section 11(b)”), 1 pursuant to which the Project Notes had been issued.”
Nicolai v. Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency, 928 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (M.D. Fla. 2013).
“The Supreme Court found that Project Notes indeed were not exempt from federal estate taxation, stating: Well before the Housing Act was passed, an exemption of property from all taxation had an understood meaning: the property was exempt from direct taxation, but certain…”
William F. Netsky v. United States, 859 F.2d 1 (3d Cir. 1988).
“653, 667 (1974) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 1437i(b) (1982)) expressed Congress’ “clear and strong intent” to make Project Notes such as those at issue here exempt from estate tax.”
Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Kay Cnty. v. Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency, 956 F. Supp. 2d 184 (D.D.C. 2013).
· cites it 2× “In Wells Fargo, the Supreme Court interpreted a provision of the Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. § 1437i(b), which attempted to stimulate housing financing by permitting state and local authorities to issue tax-free obligations called “Project Notes.”
42 U.S.C. § 1437i(b): 9 cases
Charles C. Haffner III & the N. Trust Co. v. United States, 757 F.2d 920 (7th Cir. 1985).
“On cross motions for summary judgment the district court, in a detailed and well reasoned opinion, held that the Project Notes were exempt from federal estate taxes under section 11(b) of the Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. § 1437i(b). Haffner v. United States, 585 F.”
Hertel v. Bank of Am. N.A., 897 F. Supp. 2d 579 (W.D. Mich. 2012).
“” 42 U.S.C. § 1437i(b). Despite this exemption, the Court permitted the United States to enforce its estate tax against these notes.”
Hennepin Cnty. v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 933 F. Supp. 2d 1173 (D. Minn. 2013).
“In analyzing the statute, the Court explained: Well before the Housing Act was passed, an exemption of property from all taxation had an understood meaning: the property was exempt from direct taxation, but certain privileges of ownership, such as the right to transfer the…”
42 U.S.C. § 1437i(e)(l)(E): 1 case
42 U.S.C. § 1437i(j)(2): 1 case
42 U.S.C. § 1437i(j)(l): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.