42 U.S.C. § 1453
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1965–1990 · leading case: United States v. Richard Dale Owen, 536 F.2d 340 (10th Cir. 1976).
United States v. Richard Dale Owen, 536 F.2d 340 (10th Cir. 1976). “See 42 U.S.C. § 1453 . As of July 1, 1973, ERURA had accounts payable in excess of cash on hand, but had land inventory sufficient to balance assets and liabilities.”
Jo & Wo Realty Corp. v. City of New York, 157 A.D.2d 205 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990). “Under title I of the Act, the Federal Government provided two thirds of the difference between the cost of acquiring land in substandard and insanitary areas and preparing it for redevelopment, and the price paid to the municipality by the sponsor or private developer who would…”
Tenants' Council of Tiber Island-Carrollsburg Square v. James Lynn, Individually & in His Capacity as Sec'y of Hous. & Urbandevelopment, 497 F.2d 648 (D.C. Cir. 1973). “Aaron, Shelters and Subsidies: Who Benefits From Federal Housing Policies 178 (Appendix A) (1972) ; B. T. Fitzpatrick, FHA and FNMA Assistance for Multi-Family Housing, 32 Law & Contemporary Problems 439, 443 (1967).”
Tober's Inc. v. Portsmouth Hous. Auth., 367 A.2d 603 (N.H. 1976). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1453 , 3532. The project called for extensive redevelopment of approximately thirty acres in and adjacent to the Portsmouth business district.”
Merge v. Sharott, 341 F.2d 989 (3rd Cir. 1965). “It is conceded by plaintiffs that initially the Administrator had the discretion whether or not to provide for the payment of relocation expenses ( 42 U.S.”
Jones v. Lynn, 354 F. Supp. 433 (D. Mass. 1973). “42 U.S.C. § 1453 . In implementing the program of urban renewal, which HUD monitors, the local agency must comply with the conditions of the contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.