42 U.S.C. § 14616
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2022 · leading case: Comm'r of Pub. Saf. v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 76 A.3d 185 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013).
Comm'r of Pub. Saf. v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 76 A.3d 185 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013). “Therefore, neither General Statutes § 29-164f nor 42 U.S.C. § 14616 effectively prohibited the disclosure of the NCIC printouts.”
State v. Hollins, 123 So. 3d 840 (La. Ct. App. 2013). “Consequently, the prosecutor was not aware of any convictions in Arkansas. In addition, in light of the victim’s denial of a conviction, the State asserted that there were none.”
Mobile Press Register, Inc. v. Lackey, 938 So. 2d 398 (Ala. 2006). “We also note that 42 U.S.C. § 14616 , an analogous federal statute, explicitly includes "courts" in its definition of "criminal justice agencies," while the definition of that term in the ACJIC Act does not include courts.”
Nass v. State Ex Rel. Unity Team, Local 9212, Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers, 718 N.E.2d 757 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). “” 42 U.S.C. § 14616 (defining an executive order in the context of public health and welfare).”
United States v. Nedson Davis, 233 F. App'x 944 (11th Cir. 2007). “§ 9101 (a)(2); 42 U.S.C. § 14616 (4)(A). Consequently, the probation officer in Davis’s case was required to include in Davis’s PSI all his arrests and criminal charges, regardless of whether they resulted in a conviction.”
State v. Abushaqra (Conn. App. Ct. 2016). “§ 5343 and 42 U.S.C. § 14616 ,4 and that the court, in recognition of these limitations, properly precluded the parties from using them.”
Alberty v. Hunter (D. Conn. 2022). “First, they maintain that two federal statutes—the National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact (the “Compact”), 42 U.S.C. § 14616 , and 28 U.SC. § 534—prevent their disclosure.”
Veil Vs. Bennett, 2015 NV 22 (Nev. 2015). “2, 2015), to which our agencies of criminal justice must submit reports, and which we may in turn use, see 42 U.S.C. § 14616 (2012); NRS 179A.800, and it is one of thirteen states that is a full point of contact for the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.”
Veil Vs. Bennett, 2015 NV 22 (Nev. 2015). “2, 2015), to which our agencies of criminal justice must submit reports, and which we may in turn use, see 42 U.S.C. § 14616 (2012); NRS 179A.800, and it is one of thirteen states that is a full point of contact for the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.”
Nass v. State of Indiana (Ind. 1999). “" 42 U.S.C. § 14616 (defining an executive order in the context of public health and welfare).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.