U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 146— ELECTION ADMINISTRATION IMPROVEMENT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— PAYMENTS TO STATES FOR ELECTION ADMINISTRATION IMPROVEMENTS AND REPLACEMENT OF PUNCH CARD AND LEVER VOTING MACHINES

42 U.S.C. § 15304

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2006–2006 · leading case: Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. § 15304 (a)(1). A paramount goal of this section is “[ijmproving the accessibility and quantity of polling places, including providing physical access for individuals with disabilities, providing nonvisual access for individuals with visual *498 impairments.”
Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Com'rs, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. § 15304 (a)(1). A paramount goal of this section is "[i]mproving the accessibility and quantity of polling places, including providing physical access for individuals with disabilities, providing nonvisual access for individuals with visual *498 impairments.”
Effie Stewart v. J. Kenneth Blackwell, 444 F.3d 843 (6th Cir. 2006). “1666 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 15304 ). Section 102 of the Act requires States receiving federal funds under the Act to discontinue the use of punch card systems in time for the first federal election of 2006.”
Stewart v. Blackwell (6th Cir. 2006). “1666 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 15304 ). Section 102 of the Act requires States receiving federal funds under the Act to discontinue the use of punch card systems in time for the first federal election of 2006.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.