42 U.S.C. § 15421

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2006–2006 · leading case: Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006).
Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006). “42 U.S.C. § 15421 (b). The Commonwealth Court did not take into account a primary goal of HAVA, which was to increase access at the polls for the disabled.”
Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Com'rs, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006). “42 U.S.C. § 15421 (b). The Commonwealth Court did not take into account a primary goal of HAVA, which was to increase access at the polls for the disabled.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.