42 U.S.C. § 15483
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 41
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case: Florida State Conf. of the Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Browning, 522 F.3d 1153 (11th Cir. 2008).
Florida State Conf. of the Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Browning, 522 F.3d 1153 (11th Cir. 2008). “See 42 U.S.C. § 15483 (a). Voters are required to provide on their registration application forms either the last four digits of their Social Security numbers or their driver's license numbers; if a voter has been issued neither number, then the state is required to assign to…”
Ohio Repub. Party v. Brunner, 544 F.3d 711 (6th Cir. 2008). “The chief State election official and the official responsible for the State motor vehicle authority of a State shall enter into an agreement to match information in the database of the statewide voter registration system with information in the database of the motor vehicle…”
Jesus Gonzalez v. State of Arizona, 677 F.3d 383 (9th Cir. 2012). “42 U.S.C. § 15483 (b)(4)(A)(i)-(ii). GONZALEZ v.”
Crawford v. Marion Cnty. Election Bd., 553 U.S. 181 (2008). “42 U. S. C. §15483 (a) (2000 ed., Supp. V).”
Washington Ass'n of Churches v. Reed, 492 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (W.D. Wash. 2006). “42 U.S.C. § 15483 (a). The statute requires all applicants to provide a unique identifying number — their driver’s license number or the last four digits of their social security number — on the application.”
Indiana Prot. & Advocacy Servs. v. Indiana Fam. & Soc. Servs. Admin., 603 F.3d 365 (7th Cir. 2010). “42 U.S.C. § 15483 (a)(5)(B)(i). The state’s chief election official had allegedly stopped sending data about potential “mismatches” between motor vehicle and voter registration lists some weeks before the national election.”
Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Repub. Nat'l Comm., 671 F. Supp. 2d 575 (D.N.J. 2009). “See 42 U.S.C. § 15483 (a)(1). In connection with its requirement that states compile an electronic list of all eligible voters within their borders, the HAVA imposed an obligation on state officials to maintain such lists by periodically removing the names of individuals who had…”
Edelman v. State, 160 Wash. App. 294 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “42 U.S.C. § 15483 (a)(1)(A). Section 15483(a) also provides guidelines for list maintenance.”
Common Cause of Colorado v. Buescher, 750 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (D. Colo. 2010). “” 42 U.S.C. § 15483 (a)(1)(A). SCORE is that list in Colorado.”
Florida State Conf. of the Nat'l Ass'n v. Browning, 569 F. Supp. 2d 1237 (N.D. Fla. 2008). “42 U.S.C. § 15483 (a)(5)(A)®. *1240 Election officials then attempt to verify the authenticity of the number provided by the applicant through computerized, and, if necessary, individual review of official state and federal databases.”
Simmons v. Galvin, 575 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2009). “42 U.S.C. § 15483 (a)(2)(A)(ii)(I). These two recent statutes are entirely inconsistent with reading § 2, whatever its breadth, to create a cause of action against Article 120.”
Hayden v. Pataki, 449 F.3d 305 (2d Cir. 2006). “1666 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 15483 (a)(2)(A)(ii)(I)). Finally, a number of bills have been proposed in the past several years that would limit States’ ability to disenfranchise felons.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 15483(a) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.