U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 146— ELECTION ADMINISTRATION IMPROVEMENT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— UNIFORM AND NONDISCRIMINATORY ELECTION TECHNOLOGY AND ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS › Part Part A— Requirements

42 U.S.C. § 15485

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 2004–2010 · leading case: Florida State Conf. of the Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Browning, 522 F.3d 1153 (11th Cir. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Florida State Conf. of the Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Browning, 522 F.3d 1153 (11th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. § 15485 . One such provision mandates that each state create a centralized, periodically updated database for its registration rolls, and that each registered voter must be linked to a unique identification number in this database.”
Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006). “” 42 U.S.C. § 15485 . Further, Congress recognized that “[b]y necessity, elections must occur at the State and local level.”
Ohio Repub. Party v. Brunner, 544 F.3d 711 (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. § 15485 ("The specific choices on the methods of complying with the requirements of this subchapter shall be left to the discretion of the State.”
Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Com'rs, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006). “" 42 U.S.C. § 15485 . Further, Congress recognized that "[b]y necessity, elections must occur at the State and local level.”
Cnty. of Nassau v. New York, 724 F. Supp. 2d 295 (E.D.N.Y 2010). · cites it 2× “”); see also § 15484 (“The requirements established by this subchapter are minimum requirements and nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to prevent a State from establishing election technology and administration requirements that are more strict than the requirements…”
Bay Cnty. Democratic Party v. Land, 347 F. Supp. 2d 404 (E.D. Mich. 2004). “See 42 U.S.C. § 15485 (stating that “[t]he specific choice of methods of complying with the requirements of this subchapter shall be left to the discretion of the state”).”
State Ex Rel. League v. Herrera, 203 P.3d 94 (N.M. 2009). “" 42 U.S.C. § 15485 . HAVA, then, is a floor beneath which the states are not permitted to go.”
State ex rel. League of Women Voters v. Herrera, 2009 NMSC 003 (N.M. 2009). “” 42 U.S.C. § 15485 . HAVA, then, is a floor beneath which the states are not permitted to go.”
Ohio Repub. Party v. Brunner, 582 F. Supp. 2d 957 (S.D. Ohio 2008). “See 42 U.S.C. § 15485 . Ohio holds the county boards of elections responsible for collecting the necessary information when a potential voter wishes to register.”
Ohio Repub. Party v. Jennifer Brunner (6th Cir. 2008). “42 U.S.C. § 15485 (“The specific choices on the methods of complying with the requirements of this subchapter shall be left to the discretion of the State.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.