42 U.S.C. § 15542
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2006–2006 · leading case: Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006).
Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006). “42 U.S.C. § 15542 (c). . Because it is unnecessary to our resolution of this matter, we do not address the merits of Appellants’ argument that their acceptance of HAVA Section 102 funds on the condition that the monies be used to replace lever voting machines preempts the…”
Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Com'rs, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006). “42 U.S.C. § 15542 (c). [34] Because it is unnecessary to our resolution of this matter, we do not address the merits of Appellants' argument that their acceptance of HAVA Section 102 funds on the condition that the monies be used to replace lever voting machines preempts the…”
Taylor v. Onorato, 428 F. Supp. 2d 384 (W.D. Pa. 2006). “42 U.S.C. § 15542 (c). The Supreme Court also stated that whether Congress intended to create a private right of action enforceable under section 1983 is definitively answered in the negative where a statute, by its terms, grants no private rights to any identifiable class of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.