42 U.S.C. § 16
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1990–2021 · leading case: Distrib. Servs., Ltd. v. Eddie Parker Interests, Inc., D/B/A New Trends, Inc., 897 F.2d 811 (5th Cir. 1990).
Distrib. Servs., Ltd. v. Eddie Parker Interests, Inc., D/B/A New Trends, Inc., 897 F.2d 811 (5th Cir. 1990). “See 42 U.S.C. § 16 (3)(a) (repealed 1978). The Court recognized that although an affirmative action for recovery of unreasonable freight charges would presumably be barred since the counterclaim was filed after two years had elapsed, the limitations period could not be used to…”
Drago C. Baric v. State Bar of California (C.D. Cal. 2021). “Plaintiff alleges 19 Defendants violated the ADA when they concealed the existence of, failed to 20 advise him of, and prevented him from, the Alternative Discipline Program 21 (“ADP”).”
Sarinana v. Soto (N.D. Cal. 2021). “34, 35) 12 Defendants / 13 14 INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff, a California state prisoner, filed this pro se civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 16 1983 alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights.”
Phillips v. Babbitt, Sec (4th Cir. 1998). “" Further, 42 U.S.C. § 16 (a) provides that All personnel actions affecting employee .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.