42 U.S.C. § 1973aa

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 38 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2021 · leading case: Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New York, 413 U.S. 345 (1973).
Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New York, 413 U.S. 345 (1973). · cites it 4× “42 U. S. C. § 1973aa. See Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.”
Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448 (1980). · cites it 2× “" In virtually identical language, § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment and § 2 of the Fifteenth Amendment give Congress the power to enforce the provisions of those Amendments. [3] Among the remedies approved in South Carolina v.”
Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330 (1972). · cites it 2× “[29] In the 1970 Voting Rights Act, which added § 201, 42 U. S. C. § 1973aa, Congress provided that "no citizen shall be denied, because of his failure to comply with any test or device, the right to vote in any Federal, State, or local election .”
Simmons v. Galvin, 575 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “§§ 1973b-1973c) (making the temporary nationwide ban permanent).”
Lopez v. Monterey Cnty., 525 U.S. 266 (1999). · cites it 2× “At least until a 1970 amendment to the Act barring literacy tests nationwide, see 42 U. S. C. § 1973aa, § 4 had been used to ban these tests in covered jurisdictions even where the tests had been enacted by a noncovered State.”
Riley v. Kennedy, 553 U.S. 406 (2008). “” 42 U. S. C. § 1973aa. In sum, prior to the VRA, the Alabama Supreme Court worked hand in hand with the Alabama Legislature to erect obstacles to African-American voting.”
Qualkinbush v. Skubisz, 826 N.E.2d 1181 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). · cites it 2× “On appeal, Skubisz contends that the trial court erred in failing to dismiss Qualkinbush’s petition for election contest on the basis that section 19 — 6 of the Election Code (10 ILCS 5/19 — 6 (West 2002)), the absentee ballot return provision, was preempted by the federal…”
Morse v. Repub. Party of Virginia, 517 U.S. 186 (1996). “See 42 U. S. C. § 1973aa—1(h) (defining, for purposes of § 202 of the Extension Act, "[t]he term `State' " as "each of the several States and the District of Columbia").”
Dolph Briscoe, Governor of the State of Texas v. Edward H. Levi, United States Attorney Gen., 535 F.2d 1259 (D.C. Cir. 1976). · cites it 2× “315 , as amended 42 U.S.C.A. § 1973aa (1976 Supp.), and this ban was later made permanent.”
Coalition for Educ. in Dist. One v. Bd. of Elections of New York, 370 F. Supp. 42 (S.D.N.Y. 1974). · cites it 2× “and the Voting Rights Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 1973aa et seq., which enforce the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.”
Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Mukasey, 573 F. Supp. 2d 221 (D.D.C. 2008). “For *238 example, as part of the 1970 reauthorization, Congress renewed section 4(a)’s ban on literacy tests and extended it to the entire nation.”
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Santillanes, 506 F. Supp. 2d 598 (D.N.M. 2007). · cites it 2× “amend XXVI; 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973aa to 1973bb-4. Thus, as modified by the Twenty-Sixth *609 Amendment to the United States Constitution and the federal Voting Rights Act, the basic criteria for being eligible to vote under Article VII, Section 1 of the New Mexico Constitution are:…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973aa(a) — 4 cases
Torres v. Sachs, 381 F. Supp. 309 (S.D.N.Y. 1974).
Puerto Rican Org. for Political Action v. Kusper, 350 F. Supp. 606 (N.D. Ill. 1972).
Diaz v. Cobb, 435 F. Supp. 2d 1206 (S.D. Fla. 2006).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973aa(b) — 3 cases
Dolph Briscoe, Governor of the State of Texas v. Edward H. Levi, United States Attorney Gen., 535 F.2d 1259 (D.C. Cir. 1976). “315 , as amended 42 U.S.C.A. § 1973aa (1976 Supp.), and this ban was later made permanent.”
Diaz v. Cobb, 435 F. Supp. 2d 1206 (S.D. Fla. 2006).
Diaz v. Cobb, 475 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (S.D. Fla. 2007).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.