42 U.S.C. § 1973h
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1966–2011 · leading case: Morse v. Repub. Party of Virginia, 517 U.S. 186 (1996).
Morse v. Repub. Party of Virginia, 517 U.S. 186 (1996). “Finally, I agree with Justice Stevens that Congress must be taken to have intended to authorize a private right of action to enforce § 10 of the Act, 42 U. S. C. § 1973h (1988 ed.). He explains, ante, at 231-232, that the rationale of Allen v.”
Allen v. State Bd. of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 (1968). “442 , 42 U. S. C. §§ 1973h (a)-(c) (1964 ed., Supp.”
City of Richmond v. United States, 422 U.S. 358 (1975). “§§ 1973b (a)-(d), as well as poll taxes, § 10, 42 U. S. C. § 1973h. [4] South Carolina v.”
United States v. State of Alabama, 252 F. Supp. 95 (M.D. Ala. 1966). “"Jurisdiction of three-judge district courts; appeal to Supreme Court (c) The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction of such actions which shall be heard and determined by a court of three judges in accordance with the provisions of section 2284 of Title 28…”
Shelby Cnty. Ala. v. Holder, 811 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D.D.C. 2011). “Other provisions of the Voting Rights Act ban poll taxes, 42 U.S.C. § 1973h, prohibit voter intimidation and coercion, 42 U.”
Johnson v. Bush, 214 F. Supp. 2d 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2002). “Plaintiffs argue that the Fourteenth and Twenty-Fourth Amendments to the United States Constitution and section 10 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973h, "do not permit the State to use ex-felon’s financial status to deny them the right to vote, regardless of the other…”
East Flatbush Election Comm. v. Cuomo, 643 F. Supp. 260 (E.D.N.Y 1986). “Agostinho Dias Reis in effect violated § 10 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973h, by “[conditioning access to the Courts, including the Appellate Courts [and the ballot] upon the payment of substantial sums of money by either the litigants or their attorneys.”
Beatrice Houston v. Pat W. Haley, 859 F.2d 341 (5th Cir. 1988). “§ 1973b, and poll taxes, 42 U.S.C. § 1973h. Moreover, Congress prohibited, based on the “totality of circumstances,” political processes that give a class of citizens “less opportunity than other members of the electorate to participate in the political process and to elect…”
United States v. Solomon, 563 F.2d 1121 (4th Cir. 1977). “42 U.S.C. § 1973h(c). See 42 U.S.C. § 1973j; 42 U.”
Powell v. Power, 436 F.2d 84 (2d Cir. 1970). “In addition, the Act abolished the poll tax, 42 U.S.C. § 1973h, and outlawed an *87 English literacy requirement as to would-be voters who have completed a sixth-grade education in any Americnn-flag school.”
Morse v. Oliver North for U.S. Senate Comm., Inc., 853 F. Supp. 212 (W.D. Va. 1994). “§ 1973c (Count 3); the imposition of the registration fee prohibits people of limited means from participating in voting in violation of Section 10 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973h(a) (Count 4); and the North Committee’s practice of paying registration fees for…”
Kramer v. Union Free Sch. Dist. No. 15, 379 F.2d 491 (2d Cir. 1967). “442 (1965), 42 U.S.C. § 1973h(a), that “the payment of a poll tax as a precondition to voting * * * (ii) does not bear a reasonable relationship to any legitimate State interest in the conduct of elections,” it was made clear in the House and Senate debates that this finding was…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973h(a) — 5 cases
Morse v. Repub. Party of Virginia, 517 U.S. 186 (1996). “Finally, I agree with Justice Stevens that Congress must be taken to have intended to authorize a private right of action to enforce § 10 of the Act, 42 U. S. C. § 1973h (1988 ed.). He explains, ante, at 231-232, that the rationale of Allen v.”
Morse v. Oliver North for U.S. Senate Comm., Inc., 853 F. Supp. 212 (W.D. Va. 1994). “§ 1973c (Count 3); the imposition of the registration fee prohibits people of limited means from participating in voting in violation of Section 10 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973h(a) (Count 4); and the North Committee’s practice of paying registration fees for…”
Kramer v. Union Free Sch. Dist. No. 15, 379 F.2d 491 (2d Cir. 1967). “442 (1965), 42 U.S.C. § 1973h(a), that “the payment of a poll tax as a precondition to voting * * * (ii) does not bear a reasonable relationship to any legitimate State interest in the conduct of elections,” it was made clear in the House and Senate debates that this finding was…”
Bynum v. Connecticut Comm'n on Forfeited Rights, 410 F.2d 173 (2d Cir. 1969).
Morse v. Oliver North for Us Senate, 853 F. Supp. 212 (W.D. Va. 1994).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973h(b) — 3 cases
Morse v. Repub. Party of Virginia, 517 U.S. 186 (1996). “Finally, I agree with Justice Stevens that Congress must be taken to have intended to authorize a private right of action to enforce § 10 of the Act, 42 U. S. C. § 1973h (1988 ed.). He explains, ante, at 231-232, that the rationale of Allen v.”
Morse v. Oliver North for U.S. Senate Comm., Inc., 853 F. Supp. 212 (W.D. Va. 1994). “§ 1973c (Count 3); the imposition of the registration fee prohibits people of limited means from participating in voting in violation of Section 10 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973h(a) (Count 4); and the North Committee’s practice of paying registration fees for…”
Morse v. Oliver North for Us Senate, 853 F. Supp. 212 (W.D. Va. 1994).
— 42 U.S.C. § 1973h(c) — 2 cases
United States v. State of Alabama, 252 F. Supp. 95 (M.D. Ala. 1966). “"Jurisdiction of three-judge district courts; appeal to Supreme Court (c) The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction of such actions which shall be heard and determined by a court of three judges in accordance with the provisions of section 2284 of Title 28…”
United States v. Solomon, 563 F.2d 1121 (4th Cir. 1977). “42 U.S.C. § 1973h(c). See 42 U.S.C. § 1973j; 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.