42 U.S.C. § 202
AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
“There are authorized to be appropriated, for activities under this section [title], a total of $50,000,000 for fiscal years 1997 and 1998, to remain available until
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 40
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1960–2026 · leading case: Mazaleski v. Treusdell, 562 F.2d 701 (D.C. Cir. 1977).
Mazaleski v. Treusdell, 562 F.2d 701 (D.C. Cir. 1977). “), reprinted in 42 U.S.C. § 202 app. at 9533 (1970); see 42 U.”
Forsham v. Harris, 445 U.S. 169 (1980). “), note Mowing 42 U. S. C. §202 , and Reorganization Order of April 1, 1968, 33 Fed.”
Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. United States, 73 Fed. Cl. 333 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “” 42 U.S.C. § 202 1c(b)(3)(E). However, as of the date of trial in this case, it does not appear that any utility, including PG & E, has contracted for or paid for the disposal of its GTCC.”
Brian Chu, M.D., James R. Gross, D.O., Khadijah Hamdallah, M.D., Staley Jackson, M.D., & Gregory Lower, D.O. v. The United States, 773 F.2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1985). “), reprinted at 42 U.S.C. § 202 note. The pertinent regulations provide for the removal of reserve officers without cause and without their consent in two circumstances pertinent to this case: (1) termination at any time during the "probationary period” of the first three years…”
United States v. Barbara Vanhorn, 20 F.3d 104 (4th Cir. 1994). “42 U.S.C. § 202 (1988). The Project Officer monitors the scholar’s progress and answers any questions that the scholar has about the scholarship program during the scholar’s schooling and during the period of obligated service afterward.”
Middlebrooks v. Leavitt, 525 F.3d 341 (4th Cir. 2008). “§ 202 (2000), the PHSCC is an agency in HHS rather than a military department, that PHSCC officers are free to unilaterally terminate their status in the PHSCC, and that PHSCC officers are not subject to the Code of Military Justice unless the President so declares, pursuant to…”
Dr. Alfred Milbert v. Dr. C. Everett Koop, U.S. Surgeon Gen., 830 F.2d 354 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “42 U.S.C. § 202 . It is neither a com *359 ponent of any armed force nor is its primary mission the assistance of any armed force.”
Brooks v. United States, 65 Fed. Cl. 135 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “42 U.S.C. § 202 (2000). The Service includes the Office of the Surgeon General and the Commissioned Corps of uniformed officers whom the President appoints with the advice and consent of the Senate.”
Love v. Superior Court, 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 109 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990). “( 42 U.S.C. § 202 .) We may take judicial notice of the guidelines pursuant to Evidence Code section 452, subdivision (b).”
Braidwood Mgmt v. Becerra, 104 F.4th 930 (5th Cir. 2024). “” By this request, we understand the Government to ask that we essentially interpret the statutory scheme in a way that allows Secretary Becerra to disregard the limitations set forth in § 299b- 4(a)(6).”
the Texas Comm'n on Env't Quality & Waste Control Specialists, LLC v. Sierra Club, 455 S.W.3d 228 (Tex. App. 2014). “The federal Low Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act, as amended in 1985, see 42 U.S.C. §§ 202 lb-202 lj, requires each state to provide for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste generated within its borders, see id.”
Griffin v. United States, 351 F. Supp. 10 (E.D. Pa. 1972). “§ 216 , a procedure subsequently abolished by Reorganization Plan #3 of 1966 (Appended as a footnote to 42 U.S.C.A. § 202 ). 20 . This act was properly discretionary, since no regulation then in effect foreclosed such a judgment.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 202(d) — 1 case
Runge v. Fleming, 181 F. Supp. 224 (N.D. Iowa 1960).
— 42 U.S.C. § 202(j)(5) — 1 case
Costello v. Barnhart, 458 F. Supp. 2d 594 (N.D. Ill. 2006).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.