42 U.S.C. § 2214
Repealed. Pub. L. 115–439, title I, § 101(b), Jan. 14, 2019, 132 Stat. 5568
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases, 1993–2019 · leading case: Consol. Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, 676 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2012).
Consol. Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, 676 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2012). “See 42 U.S.C. § 2214 . 6 The NRC recovers the *1337 costs of its site-specific activities by charging licensees site-specific fees under 10 C.”
Consol. Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. United States, 92 Fed. Cl. 466 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “( 42 U.S.C. § 2214 (2006); Rabideau, Tr. 5210.”
Alabama Power Co. v. United States, 119 Fed. Cl. 615 (Fed. Cl. 2014). “2012) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 2214 ). It does so by levying a variety of annual fees — some are site-specific, and others are generic and industry-wide.”
Boston Edison Co. v. United States, 658 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2011). “See 42 U.S.C. § 2214 (c)(2)(B). However, that "fee relief” is not relevant to Entergy’s damages award because it affected only the "surcharges” paid by operating facilities.”
Wisconsin Elec. Power Co. v. United States, 90 Fed. Cl. 714 (Fed. Cl. 2009). “42 U.S.C. § 2214 (c)(3). In the non-breach world, dry storage fees would have remained specific to those utilities with dry storage which would not have included WE.”
Cano v. Everest Minerals Corp., 362 F. Supp. 2d 814 (W.D. Tex. 2005). “42 U.S.C. § 2214 (hh). The Plaintiffs’ burden under Texas law is to prove to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, based on a reasonable medical probability and scientifically reliable evidence, that their exposure to ionizing radiation from the natural uranium ore and its…”
Boston Edison Co. v. United States, 93 Fed. Cl. 105 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “1388 -298 to -299 (1990) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 2214 ). 23 In response, the NRC modified its fee recovery structure for both Part 170 specific-services fees and Part 171 generic fees to enable it to “more completely recover costs incurred by the Commission.”
Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. United States, 125 Fed. Cl. 678 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “; 42 U.S.C. § 2214 (c)(3) (2012). In 1999, the NRC established a new fee under Part 171, the Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning Fee (“SFS/RD fee”).”
Allied-Signal, Inc. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 988 F.2d 146 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “101-508, § 6101 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 2214 ), and told the Commission to promulgate a rule apportioning the generic fees “fairly and equitably” among licensees.”
Sys. Fuels, Inc. v. United States, 125 Fed. Cl. 331 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “; 42 U.S.C. § 2214 (c)(3) (2012). Prior to 1999, the NRC recovered its generic costs associated with spent fuel stored outside a spent fuel pool through an annual fee assessed under Part 171, but only on licensees that held a Part 72 license to store spent fuel outside of the…”
Elec. Welfare Trust Fund v. United States, 907 F.3d 165 (4th Cir. 2018). “§ 136a(a) (authorizing the Secretary of Agriculture to prescribe fees to defray quarantine and inspection costs); 42 U.S.C. § 2214 (authorizing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to assess and collect charges and fees); 31 U.”
Velazquez v. UPMC Bedford Mem'l Hosp., 338 F. Supp. 2d 609 (W.D. Pa. 2004). “” 42 U.S.C. § 2214 (note) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.