42 U.S.C. § 254
Interdepartmental work
Nothing contained in this part shall affect the authority of the Service to furnish any materials, supplies, or equipment, or perform any work of services, requested in accordance with sections 1535 and 1536 of title 31, or the authority of any other executive department to furnish any materials, supplies, or equipment, or perform any work or services, requested by the Department of Health and Human Services for the Service in accordance with that section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37
cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: United States v. Alan J. Citrin, 972 F.2d 1044 (9th Cir. 1992).
United States v. Alan J. Citrin, 972 F.2d 1044 (9th Cir. 1992). “42 U.S.C. § 254 /(f)(l)(B)(iv). All applicants must submit signed written contracts agreeing to serve their periods of obligated service in an HMSA.”
Illinois Dept. of Pub. Health v. Jackson, 747 N.E.2d 474 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “42 U.S.C. §§ 254 l through 254s (1988). Although the Act is in many ways unique, it is useful to consider cases decided under the federal statute.”
Brignac v. United States, 239 F. Supp. 3d 1367 (N.D. Ga. 2017). “§ 233 , extends the application of the FTCA to certain public health entities, their employees, and qualified contractors receiving federal grants under 42 U.S.C. § 254 (b). The entities typically covered by the FSHCAA are community health centers that receive federal grants to…”
United States v. Swanson, 618 F. Supp. 1231 (E.D. Mich. 1985). “” 42 U.S.C. §§ 254 /, m. 2 . The Secretary is required by statute to identify those geographic areas, population groups or medical facilities which have a shortage of health manpower.”
Castaneda Ex Rel. Est. of Castaneda v. United States, 546 F.3d 682 (9th Cir. 2008). “See § 233(g) (operators of health centers receiving federal funds under 42 U.S.C. § 254 (b), (j)) (officers, employees, or contractors of health center operators), (m) (managed care plans entering into contracts with health centers), (o) (health professionals volunteering at…”
United States v. Barbara Vanhorn, 20 F.3d 104 (4th Cir. 1994). “42 U.S.C.A. § 254 / (f) (West 1991). The NHSC Act additionally provides that if the individual funded under the program breaches her contract “by failing (for any reason .”
Soler v. United States Ex Rel. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (In Re Soler), 261 B.R. 444 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2001). “See generally, 42 U.S.C. § 254 . In Matthews , the debtor refused to fulfill her service obligation, which was still an option offered her by the NHSC, and the bankruptcy court determined that the enormous amount of the debtor’s repayment obligation, nearly $400,000, which the…”
United States v. McManus, 846 F. Supp. 1283 (M.D.N.C. 1994). “Under contract principles, the court must determine if the Secretary breached its contractual duty to “[r]elease the Applicant from all or part of his or her service obligation to enter into the full-time private clinical practice of the applicant’s health profession where the…”
United States v. Thomas K. Bills, M.D., 822 F.2d 373 (3rd Cir. 1987). “42 U.S.C. § 254 / (f)(l)(B)(iv). . Section 254o (b)(1) in pertinent part provides: "if an individual breaches his written contract by failing .”
Bohrer v. City Hosp., Inc., 681 F. Supp. 2d 657 (N.D.W. Va. 2010). “, (“FTCA”), as Shenandoah was an entity receiving federal grant money from the United States Public Health Service pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 254 (b) or 254(c). Subsequent to the Removal, on August 19, 2003, the Defendant United States filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint based…”
United States v. Haithco, 644 F. Supp. 63 (W.D. Mich. 1986). “42 U.S.C. §§ 254 /, 254m. The Corps itself is part of the Public Health Service (“PHS”) and is comprised of three types of members: (1) commissioned officers of the PHS Regular Corps and Reserve Corps; (2) civilian employees of the federal government; and (3) others not…”
Kostenko v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 916 F. Supp. 2d 661 (S.D.W. Va 2013). “1994) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 254 (c)(3) (1988); 42 CFR § 62.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.