42 U.S.C. § 257

Repealed. Pub. L. 106–310, div. B, title XXXIV, § 3405(a), Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1221, as amended by Pub. L. 114–198, title I, § 110(b), July 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 710

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1968–1986 · leading case: United States v. Joseph Anthony Perez, United States of Am. v. Walter Oglesby Jones, 457 F.2d 555 (6th Cir. 1972).
United States v. Joseph Anthony Perez, United States of Am. v. Walter Oglesby Jones, 457 F.2d 555 (6th Cir. 1972). · cites it 3× “A close examination of the provisions of the Public Health Service Act relating to the care, protection and treatment of narcotic addicts, Title 42 U.S.C. § 257 et seq., will readily demonstrate that the provisions of that title are not applicable to these defendants.”
United States v. Joseph R. Fiore, 467 F.2d 86 (2d Cir. 1972). “The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §§ 257 et seq., 2688 et seq., 21 U.”
Storrer v. United States, 662 F. Supp. 18 (N.D. Ohio 1986). “, and the National Influenza Immunization Program, 42 U.S.C. § 257 (b). Plaintiffs seek damages from defendant for injuries allegedly incurred by Carol Storrer as a result of her receipt of a Swine Flu vaccination on November 30, 1976.”
Kelly v. Rasor, 283 F. Supp. 445 (E.D. Ky. 1968). “, expressly provides that “the Surgeon General is authorized to provide for the confinement, care, protection, treatment, and discipline of persons addicted to the use of habit-forming narcotic drugs who are civilly committed to treatment or con *447 victed of offenses against…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.