Notes of Decisions
Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc. v. Legal Servs. Corp., 940 F.2d 685 (D.C. Cir. 1991).
“Moreover, Congress’s decision to create LSC as an independent corporation reflected a conscious effort to ensure its freedom from political interference. See H.R.Rep. No. 247, 93d Cong., 1st Sess.”
Grassley v. Legal Servs. Corp., 535 F. Supp. 818 (S.D. Iowa 1982).
· cites it 2× “The Corporation itself must report annually to both the President and to Congress, 42 U.S.C. § 2996g(c), and file a report of annual audits with the General Accounting Office, 42 U.”
Wilkinson v. Legal Servs. Corp., 27 F. Supp. 2d 32 (D.D.C. 1998).
“42 U.S.C. § 2996g(e). D. Wilkinson’s Draft MOU Concerning the 1990 Manual Shortly after Wilkinson arrived at LSC, it became clear that he and Alice Dickerson took differing views as to what role, if any, the LSC’s Office of Human Resources would play in the process of hiring,…”
Neighborhood Legal Servs., Inc. v. Legal Servs. Corp., 466 F. Supp. 1148 (D. Conn. 1979).
· cites it 2× “However, the examiner concluded that the Corporation had violated 42 U.S. C.A. § 2996g(e) by failing to publish in the Federal Register its policies concerning funding of migrant worker programs.”
Velazquez v. Legal Servs. Corp., 985 F. Supp. 323 (E.D.N.Y 1997).
“See Act § 503(b) (“the [LSC] shall promulgate regulations to implement a competitive selection process for the recipients”); 42 U.S.C. § 2996g(e) (requiring the LSC to publish in the Federal Register “all its rules, regulations, guidelines, and in *329 struetions”).”
Nat'l Senior Citizens Law Ctr. v. Legal Servs. Corp., 751 F.2d 1391 (D.C. Cir. 1985).
“We need not reach the first and third bases on which the district court found Instruction 83-9 vulnerable: the failure to expose the directive to public comment pursuant to section 1008(e) of the LSC Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2996g(e), see 581 F.Supp. at 1368-69 ; and the lack of…”
Martens v. Hall, 444 F. Supp. 34 (S.D. Fla. 1977).
“§ 2996a(3) and 42 U. S.C. § 2996g(e). Consistent therewith the Corporation issued its regulation on “eligibility” found at 45 CFR Part 1611 as adopted on May 19, 1977.”
Nat'l Clients Council, Inc. v. Legal Servs. Corp., 617 F. Supp. 480 (D.D.C. 1985).
“” 42 U.S.C. § 2996g(b). The defendant argues, however, that its right of access to documents does not derive solely from § 2996g(b)’s right to require certain categories of documents to be maintained and to allow inspection of them, but rather from LSC’s broader right under §…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 2996g(b) — 2 cases
Nat'l Clients Council, Inc. v. Legal Servs. Corp., 617 F. Supp. 480 (D.D.C. 1985).
“” 42 U.S.C. § 2996g(b). The defendant argues, however, that its right of access to documents does not derive solely from § 2996g(b)’s right to require certain categories of documents to be maintained and to allow inspection of them, but rather from LSC’s broader right under §…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 2996g(c) — 2 cases
Grassley v. Legal Servs. Corp., 535 F. Supp. 818 (S.D. Iowa 1982).
“The Corporation itself must report annually to both the President and to Congress, 42 U.S.C. § 2996g(c), and file a report of annual audits with the General Accounting Office, 42 U.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 2996g(d) — 1 case
Grassley v. Legal Servs. Corp., 535 F. Supp. 818 (S.D. Iowa 1982).
“The Corporation itself must report annually to both the President and to Congress, 42 U.S.C. § 2996g(c), and file a report of annual audits with the General Accounting Office, 42 U.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 2996g(e) — 11 cases
Wilkinson v. Legal Servs. Corp., 27 F. Supp. 2d 32 (D.D.C. 1998).
“42 U.S.C. § 2996g(e). D. Wilkinson’s Draft MOU Concerning the 1990 Manual Shortly after Wilkinson arrived at LSC, it became clear that he and Alice Dickerson took differing views as to what role, if any, the LSC’s Office of Human Resources would play in the process of hiring,…”
Neighborhood Legal Servs., Inc. v. Legal Servs. Corp., 466 F. Supp. 1148 (D. Conn. 1979).
“However, the examiner concluded that the Corporation had violated 42 U.S. C.A. § 2996g(e) by failing to publish in the Federal Register its policies concerning funding of migrant worker programs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.