42 U.S.C. § 3142
Base closings and realignments
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may provide to an eligible recipient any assistance available under this subchapter for a project to be carried out on a military or Department of Energy installation that is closed or scheduled for closure or realignment without requiring that the eligible recipient have title to the property or a leasehold interest in the property for any specified term.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1970–2021 · leading case: Lukens Steel Co. v. Kreps, 477 F. Supp. 444 (E.D. Pa. 1979).
Lukens Steel Co. v. Kreps, 477 F. Supp. 444 (E.D. Pa. 1979). “6 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶56.17[3] at 56-595 n. 6. 4 . Report to the President: A Comprehensive Program for the Steel Industry, December 6, 1977 (unpublished report, appendix to brief of federal defendants).”
Lukens Steel Co. v. Klutznick, 629 F.2d 881 (3rd Cir. 1980). “42 U.S.C. § 3142 (b)(4). 3 EDA reiterated this requirement in the Steel Industry Lending Guidelines.”
United States v. Rueb, 612 F. Supp. 2d 1068 (D. Neb. 2009). “42 U.S.C. §§ 3142 (g). Despite these findings, the court entered an order requiring a curfew and electronic monitoring as conditions of defendant’s pretrial release as required under the Adam Walsh Amendments to the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.”
Frangella Mushroom Farms, Inc. v. United States, 229 Ct. Cl. 578 (Ct. Cl. 1981). “Corporate plaintiff thereafter sought assistance of a Member of Congress and made application for a direct business development loan under 42 U.S.C. § 3142 (1976), in the amount of $1,500,000, later reduced to $1,000,000.”
Van Hoven Co. v. Stans, 319 F. Supp. 180 (D. Minnesota 1970). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3142 . 3 . The affidavit of Russell O.”
Van Hoven Co. v. Stans, 326 F. Supp. 827 (D. Minnesota 1971). “42 U. S.C. § 3142. The Secretary has made a judgment, based on credible evidence, that such financial assistance is needful in a qualified redevelopment area where there is substantial unemployment such as in South St.”
Auth. of the Sec'y of Com. to Guarantee Payment of Interest on Loans Made to Private Borrowers by Private Lending Institutions (OLC 1979). “May 30, 1979 79-40 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE ACTING GENERAL COUNSEL, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Loans—Department of Commerce—Guarantee of Payment of Interest—42 U.S.C. § 3142 This is in response to your request of May 3, for our opinion on an aspect of the authority granted, to the…”
Penna Grp., LLC (A.S.B.C.A. 2021). “, 42 U.S.C. § 3142 (c)(3) (pertaining to wage rate violations) and 42 U.”
Lukens Steel Co. v. Kreps, 482 F. Supp. 736 (E.D. Pa. 1980). “AVAILABILITY OF SUPPORT FOR THE VACUUM DEGASSING PROJECT Section 202(b)(4) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3142 (b)(4) requires that an applicant be unable to obtain private financial support in order to qualify for EDA assistance.”
Emanuel v. SBA (D.N.H. 1998). “The court is aware of no support for the proposition that 5The plaintiff's reliance on 42 U.S.C.A. § 3142 (b)(7) and 42 U.S.C.A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.