U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 46— JUSTICE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XII–I— GRANTS TO ENCOURAGE ARREST POLICIES AND ENFORCEMENT OF PROTECTION ORDERS

42 U.S.C. § 3796hh

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1998–2015 · leading case: Isidora M. v. Silvino M., 239 Cal. App. 4th 11 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Isidora M. v. Silvino M., 239 Cal. App. 4th 11 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 3× “” (42 U.S.C. § 3796hh, former subd. (c)(3), italics added.”
Telepo v. Palmer Twp., 40 F. Supp. 2d 596 (E.D. Pa. 1999). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796hh; see also Cronin v. West Whiteland Township, 994 F.”
Cronin v. West Whiteland Twp., 994 F. Supp. 595 (E.D. Pa. 1998). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796hh; Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies, 61 Fed.”
David J. Riffle v. Shirley I. Riffle (now Miller), 774 S.E.2d 511 (W. Va. 2015). · cites it 2× “” See 42 U.S.C. § 3796hh (2012). Eligibility for these federal funds requires proof that mutual restraining orders are only issued where both parties file a claim and the court makes detailed findings of fact that both parties acted as aggressors.”
United States v. Ceballos, 566 F. App'x 746 (10th Cir. 2014). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796hh(a) (describing the purpose of a statute intended “to encourage .”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796hh(a) — 1 case
United States v. Ceballos, 566 F. App'x 746 (10th Cir. 2014). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796hh(a) (describing the purpose of a statute intended “to encourage .”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796hh(b) — 1 case
Isidora M. v. Silvino M., 239 Cal. App. 4th 11 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015). “” (42 U.S.C. § 3796hh, former subd. (c)(3), italics added.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796hh(c)(l)(C) — 2 cases
Isidora M. v. Silvino M., 239 Cal. App. 4th 11 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015). “” (42 U.S.C. § 3796hh, former subd. (c)(3), italics added.”
David J. Riffle v. Shirley I. Riffle (now Miller), 774 S.E.2d 511 (W. Va. 2015). “” See 42 U.S.C. § 3796hh (2012). Eligibility for these federal funds requires proof that mutual restraining orders are only issued where both parties file a claim and the court makes detailed findings of fact that both parties acted as aggressors.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.