42 U.S.C. § 4915

Judicial review

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Petition for review

A petition for review of action of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency in promulgating any standard or regulation under sections 4905, 4916, or 4917 of this title or any labeling regulation under section 4907 of this title may be filed only in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and a petition for review of action of the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration in promulgating any standard or regulation under section 44715 of title 49 may be filed only in such court. Any such petition shall be filed within ninety days from the date of such promulgation, or after such date if such petition is based solely on grounds arising after such ninetieth day. Action of either Administrator with respect to which review could have been obtained under this subsection shall not be subject to judicial review in civil or criminal proceedings for enforcement.

(b) Additional evidence

If a party seeking review under this chapter applies to the court for leave to adduce additional evidence, and shows to the satisfaction of the court that the information is material and was not available at the time of the proceeding before the Administrator of such Agency or Administration (as the case may be), the court may order such additional evidence (and evidence in rebuttal thereof) to be taken before such Administrator, and to be adduced upon the hearing, in such manner and upon such terms and conditions as the court may deem proper. Such Administrator may modify his findings as to the facts, or make new findings, by reason of the additional evidence so taken, and he shall file with the court such modified or new findings, and his recommendation, if any, for the modification or setting aside of his original order, with the return of such additional evidence.

(c) Stay of agency action

With respect to relief pending review of an action by either Administrator, no stay of an agency action may be granted unless the reviewing court determines that the party seeking such stay is (1) likely to prevail on the merits in the review proceeding and (2) will suffer irreparable harm pending such proceeding.

(d) Subpenas

For the purpose of obtaining information to carry out this chapter, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency may issue subpenas for the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of relevant papers, books, and documents, and he may administer oaths. Witnesses summoned shall be paid the same fees and mileage that are paid witnesses in the courts of the United States. In cases of contumacy or refusal to obey a subpena served upon any person under this subsection, the district court of the United States for any district in which such person is found or resides or transacts business, upon application by the United States and after notice to such person, shall have jurisdiction to issue an order requiring such person to appear and give testimony before the Administrator, to appear and produce papers, books, and documents before the Administrator, or both, and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by such court as a contempt thereof.

(Pub. L. 92–574, § 16, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1247.)Editorial NotesCodification

In subsec. (a), “section 44715 of title 49” substituted for “section 611 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958” on authority of Pub. L. 103–272, § 6(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1378, the first section of which enacted subtitles II, III, and V to X of Title 49, Transportation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1977–2022 · leading case: Ass'n of Am. Railroads v. Costle, 562 F.2d 1310 (D.C. Cir. 1977).
Ass'n of Am. Railroads v. Costle, 562 F.2d 1310 (D.C. Cir. 1977). · cites it 2× “This petition for review is properly before the court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 4915 . . The State of Illinois was allowed to intervene as a party respondent by order of this court on 18 May 1976.”
Chrysler Corp. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 600 F.2d 904 (D.C. Cir. 1979). · cites it 4× “Act § 16(a), 42 U.S.C. § 4915 (a) (1976). . 40 C.F.R. § 205.”
Rec. Veh. Indus. Ass'n v. Env't Prot. Agency, Chrysler Corp. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 653 F.2d 562 (D.C. Cir. 1981). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. § 4915 (a) (1976). See Outdoor Power Equip.”
United States v. S. Union Co., 630 F.3d 17 (1st Cir. 2010). “1979) (applying 42 U.S.C. § 4915 ). The CERCLA provision, to take one example, was enforced in a cost-recovery action to preclude the corporate defendant’s collateral attack on a Superfund site listing.”
Atlas Copco, Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 642 F.2d 458 (D.C. Cir. 1980). · cites it 2× “Noise Control Act of 1972, § 16(a), 42 U.S.C. § 4915 (a) (1976). Section 16(a) also authorizes review of standards and regulations promulgated under §§17 and 18, which apply respectively to railroads and motor carriers and consequently have no role in this case.”
Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 70 F.3d 1345 (D.C. Cir. 1995). “§ 300j-7(b) (1991) (review available after 45 days "if the petition is based solely on grounds arising after the expiration of such period"); Noise Control Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4915 (a) (1995) (review available after 90 days “if such petition is based solely on grounds arising after…”
United States v. Charles Weiss, 52 F.4th 546 (3rd Cir. 2022). “§ 660 (a) (1994) (permitting review of orders of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission by filing a petition in a court of appeals); 42 U.S.C. § 4915 (a) (1994) (permitting review of actions of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency by filing a…”
Outdoor Power Equip. Inst., Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 438 F. Supp. 1092 (D.D.C. 1977). · cites it 4× “In this Court’s view, section 16(a) of the Noise Control Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4915 (a) (Supp. V 1975) was meant to be such a provision.”
Atlas Copco, Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 206 U.S. App. D.C. 53 (D.C. Cir. 1979). · cites it 2× “Noise Control Act of 1972, § 16(a), 42 U.S.C. § 4915 (a) (1976). Section 16(a) also authorizes review of standards and regulations promulgated under §§ 17 and 18, which apply respectively to railroads and motor carriers and consequently have no role in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.