42 U.S.C. § 5

AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

“There are authorized to be appropriated—“(1) for grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements under section 3(a), such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2017 and each of the 4 succeeding fiscal years;“(2) for grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements under section 3(b), such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2017 and each of the 4 succeeding fiscal years; and“(3) for grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements under section 3(c), such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2017 and each of the 4 succeeding fiscal years.”

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1994 · leading case: Sheppard v. Riverview Nursing Centre, Inc., 870 F. Supp. 1369 (D. Maryland 1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Sheppard v. Riverview Nursing Centre, Inc., 870 F. Supp. 1369 (D. Maryland 1994). “When it enacted 42 U.S.C. § 5 (g)(2)(B), Congress was well-aware of the Marek decision and the importance which the Supreme Court attributed to the distinction between the phrases “attorney's fees and costs” and “attorney’s fees as part of costs.”

Application of the Resource Conservation & Recovery Act to the Dep't of Energy's Atomic Energy Act Facilities (OLC 1984). “13 T he N R C , as successor to the licen sin g functions o f the Atomic Energy C om m ission, see 42 U.S.C. § 5 8 4 1 (0 , is g enerally subject to the sam e restrictions, and has m any o f the sam e general pow ers, as DOE, under the term s o f the AEA .”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.