42 U.S.C. § 5103
Repealed. Pub. L. 104–235, title I, § 103, Oct. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 3066
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2023 · leading case: Morgan v. Getter, 441 S.W.3d 94 (Ky. 2014).
Morgan v. Getter, 441 S.W.3d 94 (Ky. 2014). “” 42 U.S.C. § 5103 (b)(2)(G) (1976 & Supp. V 1981).”
Owens Ex Rel. Owens v. Garfield, 784 P.2d 1187 (Utah 1989). “42 U.S.C. § 5103 (b)(2)(C) (1982). [5] Utah Code Ann.”
Franson v. Radich, 735 P.2d 632 (Or. Ct. App. 1987). “" 42 U.S.C. § 5103 (b)(2)(A) (1974). The former federal regulation was more explicit: "The State must have in effect a child abuse and neglect law which includes provisions for immunity for all persons reporting, whether mandated by law or not, instances of known or reasonably…”
Daymude v. State, 540 N.E.2d 1263 (Ind. Ct. App. 1989). “42 U.S.C.A. § 5103 (b)(2)(A) (1984); 45 CFR 1340.”
Elmore v. Van Horn, 844 P.2d 1078 (Wyo. 1992). “{citing 42 U.S.C. § 5103 (b)(2)). Wyoming’s reporting immunity statute fits most closely with those statutes that have been interpreted as qualified immunity statutes.”
State v. Runge, 566 A.2d 88 (Md. 1989). “In 1983, the quoted provision was codified at 42 U.S.C. § 5103 (b)(2)(E). 7 . Section 6(d) authorizes regulations “governing access to and use of confidential information which is in the possession of the [Social Services] Administration or local departments of social services.”
State v. Grover, 437 N.W.2d 60 (Minn. 1989). “” 42 U.S.C.A. § 5103 (b)(2)(B) (emphasis supplied).”
AKKIKO M. v. Superior Court, 163 Cal. App. 3d 525 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985). “” ( 42 U.S.C.A. §5103 .) Section 326 implements federal policy by providing that where a petition alleges neglect or abuse of the minor, “the probation officer or a social worker who files a petition .”
PL v. Johnson Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Assistance & Soc. Servs., 761 P.2d 985 (Wyo. 1988). “V 1981), which specifically mandated in 42 U.S.C. § 5103 (b)(2)(G) that for a state to qualify for assistance under this subsection, the state shall "provide that in every case involving an abused or neglected child which results in a judicial proceeding a guardian ad litem…”
Freed v. Worcester Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 518 A.2d 159 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1986). “Statutes in Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Wisconsin, and Wyoming have included an explicit presumption that reports of child neglect are made in…”
Seidman v. Ins. Comm'r, 532 A.2d 917 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987). “4 On appeal Petitioner contends that there is no evidence that he charged applicants a fee for placement in the Plan, that the Plan rules do not prevent him from accepting cash from applicants and purchasing money orders on their behalf, that he is entitled to accept cash…”
State v. R.H., 683 P.2d 269 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984). “] See 42 U.S.C. § 5103 (b)(2)(G) (1982) (requiring that states accepting federal funds enact such a provision).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.