42 U.S.C. § 6102
Prohibition of discrimination
Pursuant to regulations prescribed under section 6103 of this title, and except as provided by section 6103(b) and section 6103(c) of this title, no person in the United States shall, on the basis of age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 77
cases (23 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: Callum v. CVS Health Corp., 137 F. Supp. 3d 817 (D.S.C. 2015).
Callum v. CVS Health Corp., 137 F. Supp. 3d 817 (D.S.C. 2015). “§ 1681 (a); 42 U.S.C. § 6102 ; 29 U.S.C. § 794 (a). The statutory language for nondiscrimination in Section 1557 mirrors that used in the four civil rights statutes.”
Patricio Galvan, & Leandro L. Gonzales v. Bexar Cnty., Tx., & Rudy Garza & Joe Neaves, 785 F.2d 1298 (5th Cir. 1986). “Gonzales opposed the County’s motion to amend, maintaining that the original complaint alleged age discrimination (although under 42 U.S.C. § 6102 , not 29 U.S.C. § 626 ) so that the County had notice of Gonzales’s claim of age discrimination, that the Fifth Circuit found that…”
Steshenko v. Gayrard, 44 F. Supp. 3d 941 (N.D. Cal. 2014). “Under the ADA, “no person in the United States shall, on the basis of age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”
Guardians Assn. v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of New York City, 463 U.S. 582 (1983). “§ 5672 (b) (Juvenile Justice Act of 1974); 42 U. S. C. § 6102 (Age Discrimination Act); 42 U.”
C. Kamps v. Baylor Univ., 592 F. App'x 282 (5th Cir. 2014). “” 42 U.S.C. § 6102 . Unlike Title VII and the ADEA, nowhere does the ADA use “otherwise adversely affects” language.”
Andrea Schmitt v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, 965 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2020). “§ 1681 (a) (same “on the basis of sex”); 42 U.S.C. § 6102 SCHMITT V. KAISER FOUND.”
Steshenko v. Albee, 42 F. Supp. 3d 1281 (N.D. Cal. 2014). “” 42 U.S.C. § 6102 . The ADA, however, does not authorize the recovery of monetary damages as to individual defendants.”
D.A. Ex Rel. Latasha A. v. Houston Indep. Sch. Dist., 629 F.3d 450 (5th Cir. 2010). “” 42 U.S.C. § 6102 . Under the Age Act, however, a plaintiff must exhaust his administrative remedies before filing an action in the district court.”
Hilda Garcia v. Akwesasne Hous. Auth. & John Ransom, 268 F.3d 76 (2d Cir. 2001). “These two laws apply to different entities, compare 42 U.S.C. § 6102 (programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance) with 29 U.”
City of Chicago v. Sessions, 264 F. Supp. 3d 933 (N.D. Ill. 2017). “§ 794 (a); 42 U.S.C. § 6102 . Both positions are plausible, but for the reasons discussed below, the Attorney General’s position is more consistent with the plain language of the statute.”
Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Smith, 525 U.S. 459 (1999). “§ 794 (a) (prohibiting discrimination on the basis of disability in “any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance”); and §303 of the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, 42 U. S. C. §6102 (prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age in "any program or activity…”
Action All. of Senior Citizens of Greater Philadelphia v. Margaret Heckler, 789 F.2d 931 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “” See 42 U.S.C. § 6102 (1982). The ADEA, on the other hand, proscribes discrimination only in relation to employment, but it applies to all employers, public or private, who affect commerce and have more than twenty employees.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.