U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 7— SOCIAL SECURITY › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER IV— GRANTS TO STATES FOR AID AND SERVICES TO NEEDY FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN AND FOR CHILD-WELFARE SERVICES › Part Part B— Child and Family Services › Subpart subpart 1— stephanie tubbs jones child welfare services program

42 U.S.C. § 625

Limitations on authorization of appropriations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

To carry out this subpart (other than sections 626, 627, and 628b of this title), there are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary not more than $325,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2029.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1970–2004 · leading case: Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 (1970).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 (1970). · cites it 2× “" "Child-welfare programs" are defined by § 425 of the Act, 42 U. S. C. § 625 (1964 ed., Supp. IV), as "public social services which supplement, or substitute for, parental care and supervision for the purpose of (1) preventing or remedying, or assisting in the solution of…”
Rodarte v. Cox, 828 S.W.2d 65 (Tex. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C.A. § 625 (a)(1). The purpose of Title IV-B of the Act is to enable “the United States, through the Secretary, to cooperate with State public welfare agencies in establishing, extending, and strengthening child welfare services-” 42 U.”
Hansen v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 193 Cal. App. 3d 283 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 4× “” ( 42 U.S.C. § 625 .) 4 Such wording makes evident congressional recognition of the inseverability of child well-being from the preservation of the family unit.”
In Re Scott Cnty. Master Docket, 672 F. Supp. 1152 (D. Minnesota 1987). “” 42 U.S.C. § 625 (a)(1)(A). (emphasis added).”
White v. Davis, 133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 691 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “The statutes define the term “child welfare services” to apply to services intended, inter alia, to “assur[e] adequate care of children away from their homes, in cases where the child cannot be returned home or cannot be placed for adoption” ( 42 U.”
Gonzalez v. State Dep't of Child.'s Servs., 136 S.W.3d 613 (Tenn. 2004). “g„ 42 U.S.C.A. § 625 (a)(1) (West 2004); Tenn.”
Jensen v. Conrad, 570 F. Supp. 91 (D.S.C. 1983). “” 42 U.S.C. § 625 . These statutes do address by means of federal appropriations, the problem of child abuse and neglect in the individual states.”
League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Wilson, 908 F. Supp. 755 (C.D. Cal. 1995). “See 42 U.S.C. § 625 . Federal grants are made to qualified state child welfare service programs.”
Artist M. v. Gordon Johnson & Gary T. Morgan, 917 F.2d 980 (7th Cir. 1990). “” 42 U.S.C. § 625 (a)(1)(C), (D), (F). Section 622 of Title IV-B sets forth various features state plans must possess in order to be eligible for payments for these child welfare services.”
United States Ex Rel. Graber v. City of New York, 8 F. Supp. 2d 343 (S.D.N.Y. 1998). “” Social Security Act (“SSA”) § 425(a)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 625 (a)(1). To fulfill these goals, Congress created a statutory framework through which federal funds would be made available to eligible states, thereby “enabling each State to provide, in appropriate cases, foster care…”
Kruse v. Campbell, 431 F. Supp. 180 (E.D. Va. 1977). “Plaintiffs attack the latter as violative of the right to family integrity, equal protection, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 625 . Plaintiffs contend that the Virginia partial tuition reimbursement system under Va.”
Del A. v. Roemer, 777 F. Supp. 1297 (E.D. La. 1991). “17, 1991. 8 . 42 U.S.C. § 601 . 9 . See S.”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.