Notes of Decisions
Cited in
115
cases (
5 in the last 5 years), 1985–2023 · leading case:
Matter of Rose v. Moody, 629 N.E.2d 378 (NY 1993).
Matter of Rose v. Moody, 629 N.E.2d 378 (NY 1993).
· cites it 26× “They argue that New York's Family Court Act § 413 (1) (g), which conclusively fixes a minimum $25 per month floor in all cases, is not preemptively nullified by any conflict with Federal law 42 USC § 667 , which mandates a rebuttable presumption in all such instances.”
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 566 A.2d 719 (D.C. 1989).
· cites it 24× “§ 302.56 (c) (Supp. IV 1986). Both the statute and regulations contemplated that the guidelines could be established "by law or by judicial or administrative action.”
Msc v. Mcg, 442 P.3d 662 (Wyo. 2019).
· cites it 5× “§ 20-2-304 (b) (LexisNexis 2011) facially contradicts 42 U.S.C. § 667 (b)(2). This section of the federal statutes establishes a " rebuttable presumption " that the amount calculated for support under state guidelines is the appropriate amount.”
Pataky v. Pataky, 585 S.E.2d 404 (N.C. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 4× “2343 , 42 U.S.C. § 667 (b)(2) (2003). Thus, while states that adopted this requirement would establish a rebuttable presumption that the sum determined by application of a State's generalized guidelines was the proper amount of child support, they would retain the authority to…”
Ward v. McFall, 593 S.E.2d 340 (Ga. 2004).
· cites it 4× “Under 42 USCA § 667, as part of its “state plan,” Georgia must establish guidelines for child support award amounts.”
Grant v. Hager, 868 N.E.2d 801 (Ind. 2007).
· cites it 4× “42 U.S.C. § 667 (a). The Act also requires states to establish a rebuttable presumption that child support awards resulting from the application of these guidelines are correct.”
Maturo v. Maturo, 995 A.2d 1 (Conn. 2010).
· cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. § 667 (b)(2) (1988). Removing consideration of the guidelines from child support decisions deprives high income families of the fairness and consistency the guidelines require and leaves the trial and appellate courts adrift, unanchored to the core principles that…”
Amanda Swanson Niblett v. Jason Daniel Niblett, 779 S.E.2d 839 (Va. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 2× “In accord with the Federal law, 42 U.S.C.A. § 667 (a), the Virginia General Assembly enacted a statute incorporating the guidelines.”
Hunt v. Hunt, 648 A.2d 843 (Vt. 1994).
· cites it 4× “See 42 U.S.C. § 667 (1988); 45 C.F.R. § 302.56 (1993).”
Williams v. Patton, 821 S.W.2d 141 (Tex. 1992).
· cites it 2× “1305, 1321-22 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 667 (1988)). In 1985, the Texas legislature responded by amending Family Code section 14.”
Richardson v. Richardson, 401 S.E.2d 894 (Va. Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 2× “In accord with the federal law, 42 U.S.C.A. § 667 (a), the Virginia General Assembly enacted a statute incorporating the guidelines.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 667(b) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.