42 U.S.C. § 7

COST SHARING.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

“The Federal share of the cost of a research, study, or demonstration project or a desalination development project or activity carried out under this Act shall not exceed 50 percent of the total cost of the project or research or study activity. A Federal contribution in excess of 25 percent for a project carried out under this Act may not be made unless the Secretary determines that the project is not feasible without such increased Federal contribution. The Secretary shall prescribe appropriate procedures to implement the provisions of this section. Costs of operation, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation of facilities funded under the authority of this Act shall be non-Federal responsibilities.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1997–2022 · leading case: Brown-Forman Corp. v. George Miller (Ky. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Brown-Forman Corp. v. George Miller (Ky. 2017). “The second savings clause appears in 42 U.S.C. §7 _604 and. grants individuals the power to commence citizen suits to enforce the Act.”

Parker v. Dignity Health (D. Nev. 2022). “Whether Plaintiff received an appropriate medical screening 6 examination on December 4, 2017 in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 7 1395dd(a); 8 3. Whether Plaintiff suffered personal harm as a result of the alleged 9 failure of Dignity Health d/b/a St.”

Townsend, Jr. v. New Jersey Transit (D.N.J. 2022). “§ 701 ; (3) the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7 ; (4) the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, Pub.”

Scott v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (N.D.W. Va. 2019). “Specifically, nothing in 42 U.S.C. § 7 or 20 C.F.R. § 3 provides the relief plaintiff Scott is seeking.”

Admin. Assessment of Civil Penalties Against Fed. Agencies Under the Clean Air Act (OLC 1997). “” Although the term “ person” is not 2 See 42 U.S.C § 7 4 l3 (a )(3 ) (where it finds a violation, EPA may “ (A) issue an administrative penalty order in accordance with subsection (d) o f this section, (B) issue an order requiring such person to comply with such requirement o r…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.