42 U.S.C. § 7112
Congressional declaration of purpose
This chapter, referred to in introductory provisions and pars. (14) and (18), was in the original “this Act”, meaning Pub. L. 95–91,
1990—Pub. L. 101–510 substituted “chapter:” for “chapter—” in introductory provisions, capitalized the first letter of the first word in each of pars. (1) to (18), substituted a period for last semicolon in each of pars. (1) to (17), struck out “and” at end of par. (17), and added par. (19).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases, 1978–2018 · leading case: Beyond Nuclear, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. Dep't of Energy, Et Al., Defendants, 233 F. Supp. 3d 40 (D.D.C. 2017).
Beyond Nuclear, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. Dep't of Energy, Et Al., Defendants, 233 F. Supp. 3d 40 (D.D.C. 2017). “, and Department of Energy Organization Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7112 (Count IV) 3 ; and that this failure also violated the Administrative Procedure Act (Count V).”
Nuclear Transp. & Storage, Inc. v. United States, 890 F.2d 1348 (6th Cir. 1989). “The statement of purpose prefacing the Department of Energy Organization Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7112 (14), that one of the goals of the United States is to assure, to the maximum extent practicable, that private enterprise shall be utilized in the atomic energy field is a general…”
Fort Pierce Utils. Auth. v. Dep't of Energy, 503 F. Supp. 1014 (D.D.C. 1980). “42 U.S.C. § 7112 (15) [emphasis added]. OHA is also charged with endeavoring “to insure that all interests are represented” in the enforcement proceedings, not merely the interests of those for whom a cause of action under section 210 would be unavailable.”
South Carolina v. United States, 221 F. Supp. 3d 684 (D.S.C. 2016). “See 42 U.S.C.A. § 7112 . Defendant Dr. Ernest Moniz, as the United States Secretary of Energy, is responsible for monitoring and assuring proper management of the DOE.”
Shell Oil Co. v. Dep't of Energy, 477 F. Supp. 413 (D. Del. 1979). “42 U.S.C. § 7112 (7), (12). In order to assist the Secretary in carrying out these functions the Act establishes the EIA.”
Oahu Gas Serv., Inc. v. Pac. Resources, Inc., 460 F. Supp. 1359 (D. Haw. 1978). “See 42 U.S.C. § 7112 (12). The legislative history of the DOEOA may be found in H.”
Pub. Serv. Comm'n of the State of New York v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, Pennzoil Producing Co., Intervenor, 589 F.2d 542 (D.C. Cir. 1978). “§ 6213 (1976) (Energy Policy and Conservation Act provision controlling anticompetitive joint offshore leasing); 42 U.S.C.A. § 7112 (12) (West 1977) (Department of Energy should “foster and ensure competition among parties engaged in the supply of energy and fuels”); 42 U.”
Osborn v. Pennsylvania-Delaware Serv. Station Dealers Ass'n, 499 F. Supp. 553 (D. Del. 1980). “42 U.S.C. § 7112 (2) and (3); 15 U.S.C. § 753 (a) and (b)(2)(C).”
Juliana v. United States, 339 F. Supp. 3d 1062 (D. Or. 2018). “§ 1344 ; *1095 42 U.S.C. §§ 7112 ; 6291-6296; 7401-7431; 13 49 U.”
Getty Oil Co. v. Dep't of Energy, 569 F. Supp. 1204 (D. Del. 1983). “Section 102 of the DOE Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7112 , states that one of the Act’s purposes is “to promote the interests of consumers through the provision of an adequate and reliable supply of energy at the lowest reasonable cost.”
Abraham v. Hodges, 255 F. Supp. 2d 539 (D.S.C. 2002). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 7112 , 7132, 7133(a)(8), 7274m, 7274n, 7274p; Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Support of Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, and Summary Judgment, Ex.”
Ad Hoc Comm. for Integrity in the Dep't of Energy v. Hodel, 594 F. Supp. 569 (D.D.C. 1984). “Plaintiffs alleged that the RIF which was scheduled to occur on September 14, 1984 would violate two provisions of the Department of Energy Organization Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7112 , 7133(a)(7). According to plaintiffs, these sections of the Act mandate certain programs of consumer…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.