42 U.S.C. § 7155
Repealed. Pub. L. 103–272, § 7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1982–2017 · leading case: In Re: Condemnation by Sunoco Pipeline, L.P. of Permanent & Temp. Rights of Way for the Transp. of Ethane, Propane, Liquid Petroleum Gas, & other Petroleum Prods. in the Twp. of North Middleton, Cumberland Cnty., PA ~ Appeal of: R.S. Martin, 143 A.3d 1000 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016).
In Re: Condemnation by Sunoco Pipeline, L.P. of Permanent & Temp. Rights of Way for the Transp. of Ethane, Propane, Liquid Petroleum Gas, & other Petroleum Prods. in the Twp. of North Middleton, Cumberland Cnty., PA ~ Appeal of: R.S. Martin, 143 A.3d 1000 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016). “, 42 U.S.C. § 7155 ; 42 U.S.C. § 7172 (b) (transferring authority conferred by ICA upon the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) to regulate pipeline transportation of oil to FERC); 49 U.”
State of Alaska v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, Trans Alaska Pipeline Sys. (Taps Carriers), Petro Star Inc., Intervenors, 980 F.2d 761 (D.C. Cir. 1992). “The rate-making is a proceeding between the Commission as regulator, see 42 U.S.C. §§ 7155 , 7172(b), and the pipeline owners whose interstate rates are within the Commission’s regulatory authority.”
Farmers Union Cent. Exch. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 557 F. Supp. 34 (D.D.C. 1982). “In petitioning the Court for remand, the FERC expressed its intention to expeditiously dispose of this case. The Court of *36 Appeals reversed the ICC decision and relying upon assurances of expediency remanded the case to the FERC in 1978.”
Nat'l Steel Corp. v. Long, 718 F. Supp. 622 (W.D. Mich. 1989). “42 U.S.C. § 7155 ; 42 U.S.C. § 7172 (b). The parties also agree that under federal law, liquid ethane is an "oil.”
CF Indus., Inc. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 925 F.2d 476 (D.C. Cir. 1991). “See 42 U.S.C. § 7155 . The rates charged for pipeline transportation of these products were still to be subject to the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act, but ■ would be overseen by FERC instead of the ICC.”
Coastal States Trading, Inc. v. Shell Pipeline Corp., 573 F. Supp. 1415 (S.D. Tex. 1983). “See 42 U.S.C. § 7155 (Supp. III 1979). *1420 The Court concludes that under its plain language, the Interstate Commerce Act is inapplicable to this transaction.”
In Re: Condemnation by Sunoco Pipeline L.P. (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2017). “C. § 60502 (regarding FERC jurisdiction over rates for the transportation of oil by pipeline formerly vested in the ICC).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.