42 U.S.C. § 7403
TERMINATION OF THE CORPORATION.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1981–2023 · leading case: Massachusetts v. Env't Prot. Agency, 549 U.S. 497 (2007).
Massachusetts v. Env't Prot. Agency, 549 U.S. 497 (2007). “2652 , 2703, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7403 (g)(1) and 7671a(e)). EPA further reasoned that Congress' "specially tailored solutions to global atmospheric issues," 68 Fed.”
United States v. Stauffer Chem. Co., 684 F.2d 1174 (6th Cir. 1982). “As stated in the Senate Report about Section 308, the authority to enter is not extended to contractors with the EPA in pursuit of research and development. . The district court pointed to the last sentence in the quoted statement regarding contractors and found that, since…”
Physicians For Soc. Responsibility v. Wheeler, 359 F. Supp. 3d 27 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “, 42 U.S.C. § 7403 (b)(3) (Clean Air Act); 33 U.”
Massachusetts v. Env't Prot. Agency, 415 F.3d 50 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “42 U.S.C. § 7403 (g). While the section also provides that “[njothing in this stibsection shall be construed to authorize the imposition on any person of air pollution control requirements,” id.”
Jerome J. Scalise v. Richard Thornburgh, 891 F.2d 640 (7th Cir. 1989). “, The Clean Air Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7403 et seq., Pub.L. No. 91-604, § 109 , 84 Stat.”
United States v. Stauffer Chem. Co., 511 F. Supp. 744 (M.D. Tenn. 1981). “” Section 103 of the Clean Air Act, however, clearly provides for the use of “private agencies, institutions, and organizations, and individuals,” 42 U.S.C. § 7403 (b)(4), to “conduct investigations and research and make surveys concerning any specific problem of air pollution,”…”
Sierra Club v. Env't Prot. Agency, 769 F.2d 796 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “The petitioners also successfully opposed the efforts of an intervenor to persuade the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari.”
Charlene Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp, 83 F.4th 244 (3rd Cir. 2023). “15, 1990) (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 7403 (g)). As part of its response to that mandate, the EPA introduced the Energy Star Program in 1992 “as a voluntary labeling program designed to promote – and allow consumers to identify – 1 In amending the Clean Air Act of 1963, Pub.”
Chem. Weapons Working Grp., Inc. v. United States Dep't of the Army, 111 F.3d 1485 (10th Cir. 1997). “, 42 U.S.C. § 7403 (e)(4) (requiring Environmental Protection Agency to evaluate “the effects of air pollution on water quality”); §§ 7651(a)-(o) (regulating pollution sources of acid rain).”
Bunker Hill Co. Lead & Zinc Smelter v. U. S. Env't Prot. Agency, 658 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir. 1981). “Congress would not have authorized the EPA to cooperate “with any air pollution control agency,” 42 U.S.C. § 7403 (a)(3), nor to “make grants to air pollution control agencies,” id.”
Use of Appropriated Funds to Provide Light Refreshments to Non-Fed. Participants at EPA Conferences (OLC 2007). “Among these are section 103 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7403 (2000); section 104 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.”
New York v. Browner, 50 F. Supp. 2d 141 (N.D.N.Y. 1999). “”); compare 42 U.S.C. § 7403 (requiring the acid precipitation assessment program, which includes the Administrator of the EPA, to submit a report to Congress identifying “the reduction in deposition, rates that-must be achieved in order to prevent adverse ecological effects.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.