42 U.S.C. § 7401
SHORT TITLE.
“This subtitle may be cited as the ‘Synthetic Fuels Corporation Act of 1985’.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1,073
cases (121 in the last 5 years), 1977–2026 · leading case: Engine Mfrs. Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist., 541 U.S. 246 (2004).
Engine Mfrs. Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist., 541 U.S. 246 (2004). “392 , as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 7401 et seq., prohibits one of the most polluted regions in the United States [1] from requiring private fleet operators to buy clean engines that are readily available on the commercial market.”
Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc., 452 U.S. 264 (1981). “Appellees contend that a variety of federal statutes such as the Clean Air Act, 42 U. S. C. § 7401 et seq. (1976 ed., Supp.”
Citizens to Save Spencer Cnty. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 600 F.2d 844 (D.C. Cir. 1979). “392 (17 Dec. 1963), as amended, 42 U.S.C.”
United States Sugar Corp. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 830 F.3d 579 (D.C. Cir. 2016). “” 3 Collectively, these rules — all promulgated under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq. — set emissions limits on certain combustion machinery known to release hazardous air pollutants (HAPs).”
Cal. Cmty. Against Toxics v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 934 F.3d 627 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “Congress enacted the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., to “protect and enhance the quality of the Nation’s air 6 resources .”
Rockwell Int'l Corp. v. United States, 549 U.S. 457 (2007). “; the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. ; the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.”
Alaska Dep't of Env't Conservation v. Env't Prot. Agency, 540 U.S. 461 (2004). “1676 , 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., in response to "dissatisfaction with the progress of existing air pollution programs.”
In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (\MTBE\") Prods. Liab. Litig.", 725 F.3d 65 (2d Cir. 2013). “Treatment with MTBE increased the oxygen content of gasoline and mitigated harm to air quality caused by automobile emissions, thereby furthering the goals of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 -7671q, as amended from time to time.”
Sierra Club v. Browner, 130 F. Supp. 2d 78 (D.D.C. 2001). “Seeking relief under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. (CAA), Plaintiffs Sierra Club and Missouri Coalition for the Environment filed two separate complaints alleging that Defendant Carol M.”
Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo, 456 U.S. 305 (1982). “IV); the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 42 U. S. C. § 7401 et seq. (1976 ed., Supp.”
Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546 (1986). “The questions presented in this case are first, whether the Clean Air Act, 42 U. S. C. § 7401 et seq., authorizes attorney's fees awards for time spent by counsel participating in regulatory proceedings; second, whether a court may enhance an award to reflect superior quality of…”
Blanchard v. Bergeron, 489 U.S. 87 (1989). “Even when considering the award of attorney's fees under the Clean Air Act, 42 U. S. C. § 7401 , the Court has applied the § 1988 approach, stating: "A strong presumption that the lodestar figure the product of reasonable hours times a reasonable rate represents a…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 7401(a)(3) — 1 case
Beentjes v. Placer Cnty. Air Pollution Control Dist., 254 F. Supp. 2d 1159 (E.D. Cal. 2003).
— 42 U.S.C. § 7401(b)(1) — 1 case
Mayor & City Cncl. Of Balt. V. B.P. P.L.C. (Md. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.