42 U.S.C. § 7550
Definitions
Section was formerly classified to section 1857f–7 of this title.
1990—Par. (1). Pub. L. 101–549, § 223(b), inserted references to new nonroad vehicles or new nonroad engines.
Pars. (7) to (11). Pub. L. 101–549, § 223(a), added pars. (7) to (11).
1970—Pub. L. 91–604, § 11(a)(2)(A), substituted “part” for “subchapter”.
Par. (1). Pub. L. 91–604, § 10(d)(1), inserted reference to section 7521 of this title.
Par. (3). Pub. L. 91–604, § 10(d)(2), inserted provisions which defined such terms with respect to imported vehicles or engines.
1967—Pub. L. 90–148 inserted “as used in sections 7522, 7525, 7541, and 7542 of this title” after “manufacturer” in par. (1).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1986–2024 · leading case: Epc of Hillsborough Cty. v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., 959 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 2020).
Epc of Hillsborough Cty. v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., 959 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 2020). “After a new motor vehicle is sold “to an ultimate purchaser,” 42 U.S.C. § 7550 (3), the express preemption clause no longer applies.”
Engine Mfrs. Ass'n v. U.S. Env't Prot. Agency, 88 F.3d 1075 (D.C. Cir. 1996). “42 U.S.C. § 7550 (10) (1994) (amended by Pub.”
Truck Trailer Mfrs. Ass'n v. EPA, 17 F.4th 1198 (D.C. Cir. 2021). “” 42 U.S.C. § 7550 (2). That makes a self-propelled tractor a “motor vehicle” long before a trailer is ever attached.”
Pers. Watercraft Coalition v. Marin Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 425 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002). “” ( 42 U.S.C. § 7550 (10) & (11).) 9 We note that federal authorities have seen fit to ban personal watercraft in marine sanctuaries such as Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary ( 15 C.”
Am. Road & Transp. Builders Ass'n v. Env't Prot. Agency, 865 F. Supp. 2d 72 (D.D.C. 2012). “42 U.S.C. § 7550 (10). Most of the provisions concerning nonroad engines also apply to nonroad vehicles, defined as "a vehicle that is powered by a non-road engine and that is not a motor vehicle or a vehicle used solely for competition," id.”
Sierra Club v. Env't Prot. Agency, 325 F.3d 374 (D.C. Cir. 2003). “The statute defines “motor vehicle” separately from “new motor vehicle,” see 42 U.S.C. § 7550 (2), (3), suggesting that any use of the term “motor vehicle” simpliciter encompasses in-use vehicles; but as “subsection (a)(1)” authorizes regulations only for “new motor vehicles,”…”
United States v. Navistar Int'l Corp., 240 F. Supp. 3d 789 (N.D. Ill. 2017). “Part 10681 The governmént argues that the on-highway regulations plainly and unambiguously provide that an engine is only considered “produced” when all manufacturing and assembling processes necessary to make the engine “saleable” have occurred.”
Valley Ice & Fuel Co., Inc. v. United States, 30 F.3d 635 (5th Cir. 1994). “§ 4902 (4) (defining “ultimate purchaser” with respect to noise control prevention measures concerning purchased automobiles); 42 U.S.C. § 7550 (5) (1988) (defining “ultimate purchaser” with respect to air pollution prevention measures concerning purchased motor vehicles).”
People Ex Rel. State Air Resources Bd. v. Wilmshurst, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 139 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999). “( 42 U.S.C. § 7550 (3), (5).) By contrast, California law (as previously noted) “conclusively” presumes for vehicles with fewer than 7,500 odometer miles that the person acquiring the vehicle does not have the status of ultimate purchaser (regardless of the actual intent of the…”
TIG Ins v. Woodsboro Farmers Coop, 117 F.4th 715 (5th Cir. 2024). “The Supreme Court of Texas quoted with approval a case from the Illinois Supreme Court that described what was needed to show physical injury apart from “intangible damage, such as diminution in value”: “a harmful change in appearance, shape, composition, or some other physical…”
Anderson Shipping Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Lee M. Thomas, Adm'r, & United States of Am., 852 F.2d 1387 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “42 U.S.C. § 7550 (3). The broader view of the statutory scheme supports EPA’s jurisdiction.”
Georgia Auto. Importers Compliance v. Bowers, 639 F. Supp. 352 (N.D. Ga. 1986). “42 U.S.C. § 7550 (3) (1982). [8] The Pennsylvania statute upon which the original suit revolved, 419 F.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.