U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 88— URANIUM MILL TAILINGS RADIATION CONTROL › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM

42 U.S.C. § 7921

Public participation; public hearings

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

In carrying out the provisions of this subchapter, including the designation of processing sites, establishing priorities for such sites, the selection of remedial actions, and the execution of cooperative agreements, the Secretary, the Administrator, and the Commission shall encourage public participation and, where appropriate, the Secretary shall hold public hearings relative to such matters in the States where processing sites and disposal sites are located.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1988–2009 · leading case: Dunn v. United States, 842 F.2d 1420 (3d Cir. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dunn v. United States, 842 F.2d 1420 (3d Cir. 1988). · cites it 4× “In Count II, plaintiffs sought declaratory, mandatory, and injunctive relief against DOE for its alleged failure to comply with the public participation provisions of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 (“UMTRCA”), 42 U.S.C. § 7921 (1982). Specifically,…”
El Paso Nat. Gas Co. v. United States, 605 F. Supp. 2d 224 (D.D.C. 2009). “Plaintiff also alleges as part of its APA claim that, in connection with DOE's decision not to designate the Properties as vicinity properties, DOE, EPA and the NRC failed to comply with UMTRCA's public participation provision, 42 U.S.C. § 7921 , which requires the agencies to…”
Hecla Mining Co. v. United States, 909 F.2d 1371 (10th Cir. 1990). “In carrying out the provisions of this subchapter, including the designation of processing sites, establishing priorities for such sites, the selection of remedial actions, and the execution of cooperative agreements, the Secretary, the Administrator, and the Commission shall…”
El Paso Nat. Gas Co. v. United States, No. 2007-0905 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2009). “5 Plaintiff also alleges as part of its APA claim that, in connection with DOE's decision not to designate the Properties as vicinity properties, DOE, EPA and the NRC failed to comply with UMTRCA's public participation provision, 42 U.S.c.§ 7921, which requires the agencies to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.