42 U.S.C. § 9858

Authorization of appropriations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subchapter $2,360,000,000 for fiscal year 2015, $2,478,000,000 for fiscal year 2016, $2,539,950,000 for fiscal year 2017, $2,603,448,750 for fiscal year 2018, $2,668,534,969 for fiscal year 2019, and $2,748,591,018 for fiscal year 2020.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1998–2023 · leading case: Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002).
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002). · cites it 2× “§§ 3451 , 3698; and *667 through childcare programs such as the Child Care and Development Block Grant Program (CCDBG), 42 U. S. C. § 9858 (1994 ed., Supp. V). Medicare and Medicaid provide federal funds to pay for the healthcare of the elderly and the poor, respectively, see 1…”
George v. Bloomberg, 2 A.D.3d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003). “The IAS court dismissed the petition on the ground that the CCDBG Act ( 42 USC § 9858 et seq.) cannot be enforced through a private right of action.”
Jones v. Sullivan, 703 N.E.2d 1102 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998). “The federal childcare programs involved here have been replaced by the Child Care and Development Block Grant Amendments of 1996, 42 U.S.C. § 9858 . Public Law 104-193 §§ 601-15 (effective October 1, 1996).”
Johnsen v. State, 697 N.W.2d 237 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 2× “The second stream is found at 42 U.S.C. § 9858 (2000), part of the CCDBGA.”
YMCA of Parkersburg v. West Virginia Dep't of Health & Human Resources (2023). “YMCA highlighted the importance of the issuance of these first strikes against its facilities, as the mere issuance of the first strikes discontinued payments, totaling approximately $250,000, that YMCA was otherwise qualified to receive under a federal stabilization program…”
Jurist v. The Long Island Power Auth. (E.D.N.Y 2021). “2003) (holding that the plaintiffs could not bring an Article 78 proceeding to challenge the City of New York’s plans for federal child development grant funds because the relevant federal statute — the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act, 42 USC § 9858 et seq. — did not…”
Indirect Aid to Faith-Based Organizations Under the Charitable Choice Provisions of the Cmty. Solutions Act of 2001 (OLC 2001). “4 SHELDON BRADSHAW Deputy Assistant Attorney General Office of Legal Counsel 4 The Child Care and Development Block Grant Program of 1990, see 42 U.S.C. §§ 9858 -9858q (1994), for example, has been providing low-income parents indirect aid for child care via “certifi- cates”…”
Women's Voices for the Earth, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Co., 29 Misc. 3d 358 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2010). “tion that could be enforced in the context of a CPLR article 78 proceeding for health care providers such as the petitioners]; Matter of George v Bloomberg, 2 AD3d 294, 294 [1st Dept 2003] [rejecting the argument that, because the petitioners sought mandamus in an article 78…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.