U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 106— COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM

42 U.S.C. § 9912

Office of Community Services

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Office

The Secretary shall carry out the functions of this chapter through an Office of Community Services, which shall be established in the Department of Health and Human Services. The Office shall be headed by a Director.

(b) Grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements

The Secretary shall carry out functions of this chapter through grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, § 678, as added Pub. L. 105–285, title II, § 201, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2742.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 9912, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, § 684, formerly § 683, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 519; Pub. L. 98–288, § 31(b), May 21, 1984, 98 Stat. 198; renumbered § 684, Pub. L. 103–252, title II, § 205(1), May 18, 1994, 108 Stat. 655, contained provisions repealing certain other statutory provisions, reauthorizing appropriations, and conforming references, prior to general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 105–285.

A prior section 678 of Pub. L. 97–35 was classified to section 9907 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 105–285.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1985–2016 · leading case: Greater Houston P'ship v. Ken Paxton, Texas Attorney Gen. & Jim Jenkins, 468 S.W.3d 51 (Tex. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Greater Houston P'ship v. Ken Paxton, Texas Attorney Gen. & Jim Jenkins, 468 S.W.3d 51 (Tex. 2015). “Here, GHP did not segregate funds, and it argued that such segregation would be logistically impossible. . The federal program is codified at 42 U.”
Kentucky River Foothills Dev. Council, Inc. v. Phirman, 504 S.W.3d 11 (Ky. 2016). “See 42 U.S.C.A. § 9912 (a), The distinguishing feature of the CSBGP was that it shifted the responsibility for running the program from the federal government to the States.”
Casillas v. State, 733 S.W.2d 158 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986). “, repealed, 42 U.S.C.A. § 9912 (West 1983). Of the $419,000 grant, $150,000 was originally designated to establish an equity loan fund, for purposes of lending “seed” *160 money to farmworkers who wanted to start their own businesses.”
Amaya v. State, 733 S.W.2d 168 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986). “, repealed, 42 U.S.C.A. § 9912 (West 1983). Of the $419,000 grant, $150,000 was originally designated to establish an equity loan fund, for purposes of lending “seed” money to farmworkers who wanted to start their own businesses.”
Bankston v. Bd. of Ethics, 715 So. 2d 1181 (La. 1998). · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C.A. § 9912 (a) (West 1995). Prior to its repeal, section 2790(a) of the Economic Opportunity Act stated, "A community action agency shall be .”
Rogers v. United States, 14 Cl. Ct. 39 (Ct. Cl. 1987). “See 42 U.S.C. § 9912 (a). Because the statute was repealed on the same day the Director was unable to fund plaintiffs, the Director’s inability to fund plaintiffs could not violate the repealed statutory provisions.”
Rogers v. Ink, 766 F.2d 430 (10th Cir. 1985). “42 U.S.C. § 9912 (a). I R. 254-55. Second, the funding decision did not deprive plaintiffs of due process of law.”
Casillas v. Pecos Cnty. Cmty. Action Agency, 792 S.W.2d 203 (Tex. App. 1990). “See 42 U.S.C.A. § 9912 (a). The purpose of this legislation was to deemphasize the role of the federal government in distributing funds and to build the role of state and local entities.”
Greater Houston P'ship v. Ken Paxton, Texas Attorney Gen. & Jim Jenkins (Tex. 2015). “See 42 U.S.C. § 9912 (2012). 11 Available at http://www.”
Copano NGL Servs., LLC v. John Ashcraft, Individually & as Tr. for the John Ashcraft Fam. Trust 2012 (Tex. App. 2015). “See42 U.S.C. § 9912 (2012). over the instruments they have created.”
Copano NGL Servs., LLC v. John Ashcraft, Individually & as Tr. for the John Ashcraft Fam. Trust 2012 (Tex. App. 2015). “See 42 U.S.C. § 9912 (2012). over the instruments they have created.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.