43 U.S.C. § 1624
Regulations; issuance; publication in Federal Register
The Secretary is authorized to issue and publish in the Federal Register, pursuant to subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1975–2020 · leading case: Aleknagik Natives, Ltd. v. United States, 635 F. Supp. 1477 (D. Alaska 1986).
Aleknagik Natives, Ltd. v. United States, 635 F. Supp. 1477 (D. Alaska 1986). “§ 1601 (b), ANCSA section 25, 43 U.S.C. § 1624 , the Freedom of Information Act, specifically 5 U.”
Leisnoi, Inc. v. Omar Stratman, 154 F.3d 1062 (9th Cir. 1998). “Pursuant to ANCSA § 25, which authorizes regulations necessary for carrying out, the Act, see 43 U.S.C. § 1624 , the Secretary of the Interior has established requirements that a village must meet before it can receive ANCSA land benefits.”
Aleknagik Natives Ltd. v. Andrus, 648 F.2d 496 (9th Cir. 1980). “Thus, they alleged that the Secretary violated procedural requirements of ANCSA, 43 U.S.C. § 1624 , by failing to publish ANCSA land selection regulations; that the Secretary failed to communicate with the plaintiffs on their rights to select land as required by 43 U.”
Koniag, Inc. v. Kleppe, 405 F. Supp. 1360 (D.D.C. 1975). “As to the listed villages, the question is presented whether these regulations are consistent with the Act and within the rule-making power conferred upon the Secretary by 43 U.S.C. § 1624 (Supp. Ill, 1973). The Court holds that the statutory standards for listed villages are…”
Aleknagik Natives Ltd. v. United States, 806 F.2d 924 (9th Cir. 1986). “We need look no further than the words of the statute to reject appellants’ argument on this score.”
Gwitchyaa Zhee Corp. v. Alexander (D. Alaska 2020). “Defendants couch this as a Supremacy Clause argument and insist that the court has misapplied 43 U.S.C. § 1624 and 43 C.F.R. § 2650.5 - 4(c)(1) to their affirmative defenses.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.