U.S. Code » Title 43 » Chapter CHAPTER 37— PUBLIC RANGELANDS IMPROVEMENT

43 U.S.C. § 1901

Congressional findings and declaration of policy

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 43 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The Congress finds and declares that—(1) vast segments of the public rangelands are producing less than their potential for livestock, wildlife habitat, recreation, forage, and water and soil conservation benefits, and for that reason are in an unsatisfactory condition;(2) such rangelands will remain in an unsat­isfactory condition and some areas may decline further under present levels of, and funding for, management;(3) unsatisfactory conditions on public rangelands present a high risk of soil loss, desertification,11 So in original. and a resultant underproductiv­ity for large acreages of the public lands; contribute significantly to unacceptable levels of siltation and salinity in major western watersheds including the Colorado River; negatively impact the quality and availability of scarce western water supplies; threaten important and frequently critical fish and wildlife habitat; prevent expansion of the forage resource and resulting benefits to livestock and wildlife production; increase surface runoff and flood danger; reduce the value of such lands for recreational and esthetic purposes; and may ultimately lead to unpredictable and undesirable long-term local and regional climatic and economic changes;(4) the above-mentioned conditions can be addressed and corrected by an intensive public rangelands maintenance, management, and improvement program involving significant increases in levels of rangeland management and improvement funding for multiple-use values;(5) to prevent economic disruption and harm to the western livestock industry, it is in the public interest to charge a fee for livestock grazing permits and leases on the public lands which is based on a formula reflecting annual changes in the costs of production;(6) the Act of December 15, 1971 (85 Stat. 649, 16 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.), continues to be successful in its goal of protecting wild free-roaming horses and burros from capture, branding, harassment, and death, but that certain amendments are necessary thereto to avoid excessive costs in the administration of the Act, and to facilitate the humane adoption or disposal of excess wild free-roaming horses and burros which because they exceed the carrying capacity of the range, pose a threat to their own habitat, fish, wildlife, recreation, water and soil conservation, domestic livestock grazing, and other rangeland values;(b) The Congress therefore hereby establishes and reaffirms a national policy and commitment to:(1) inventory and identify current public rangelands conditions and trends as a part of the inventory process required by section 1711(a) of this title;(2) manage, maintain and improve the condition of the public rangelands so that they become as productive as feasible for all rangeland values in accordance with management objectives and the land use planning process established pursuant to section 1712 of this title;(3) charge a fee for public grazing use which is equitable and reflects the concerns addressed in paragraph (a)(5) above;(4) continue the policy of protecting wild free-roaming horses and burros from capture, branding, harassment, or death, while at the same time facilitating the removal and disposal of excess wild free-roaming horses and burros which pose a threat to themselves and their habitat and to other rangeland values;(c) The policies of this chapter shall become effective only as specific statutory authority for their implementation is enacted by this chapter or by subsequent legislation, and shall be construed as supplemental to and not in derogation of the purposes for which public rangelands are administered under other provisions of law.(Pub. L. 95–514, § 2, Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 1803.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Act of December 15, 1971, referred to in subsec. (a)(6), is Pub. L. 92–195, Dec. 15, 1971, 85 Stat. 649, popularly known as the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act, which is classified generally to chapter 30 (§ 1331 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1331 of Title 16 and Tables.

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (c), was in the original “this Act”, meaning Pub. L. 95–514, Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 1803, which enacted this chapter and amended sections 1739 and 1751 to 1753 of this title and sections 1332 and 1333 of Title 16. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out below and Tables.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesShort Title

Pub. L. 95–514, § 1, Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 1803, provided: “That this Act [enacting this chapter and amending sections 1739 and 1751 to 1753 of this title and sections 1332 and 1333 of Title 16, Conservation] may be cited as the ‘Public Rangelands Improvement Act of 1978’.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases, 1982–2017 · leading case: Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Hodel, 618 F. Supp. 848 (E.D. Cal. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Hodel, 618 F. Supp. 848 (E.D. Cal. 1985). · cites it 8× “; the Public Rangelands Improvement Act of 1978 (PRIA), 43 U.S.C. § 1901 , et seq.; the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), 5 U.”
Am. Horse Prot. Ass'n v. James G. Watt, 694 F.2d 1310 (D.C. Cir. 1982). · cites it 3× “1803 , 43 U.S.C. § 1901 (a)(6) (Supp. IV 1980). The 1978 amendments embodied two substantive goals.”
Pub. Lands Council v. Babbitt, 529 U.S. 728 (2000). · cites it 2× “1803 (codified as 43 U. S. C. § 1901 (a)(1)). D In the 1960's, as the range failed to recover, the Secretary of the Interior increased grazing fees by more than 50% (from 19 cents to 30 cents per AUM/year), thereby helping to capture a little more of the economic costs that…”
United States v. State Eng'r, 27 P.3d 51 (Nev. 2001). · cites it 2× “Public Rangeland Improvement Act, 43 U.S.C. § 1901 (1994). Water is one of the resources discussed in the Act.”
Pub. Lands Council v. Babbitt, 154 F.3d 1160 (10th Cir. 1998). · cites it 3× “, and the Public Rangelands Improvement Act of 1978 (PRIA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1901 et seq., when he promulgated new regulations governing the administration of livestock grazing on public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).”
Wyoming v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 839 F.3d 938 (10th Cir. 2016). “1803 , 1803 (1978) (codified as amended at 43 U.S.C. § 1901 (a)(6)). Accordingly, Congress amended the Act to give the Secretary of the Interior greater authority to manage wild horses on public lands.”
W. Rangeland Conservation Ass'n v. Zinke, 265 F. Supp. 3d 1267 (D. Utah 2017). “ended the WHA to avoid excessive costs in the administration of the Act, and to facilitate the humane adoption or disposal of excess wild free-roaming horses and burros which because they exceed the carrying capacity of the range, pose a threat to their own habitat, fish,…”
Pub. Lands Council v. Babbitt, 167 F.3d 1287 (10th Cir. 1999). · cites it 3× “, and the Public Rangelands Improvement Act of 1978 (PRIA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1901 et seq., when he promulgated new regulations governing the administration of livestock grazing on public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).”
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Hodel, 624 F. Supp. 1045 (D. Nev. 1985). “95-514, §§ 2(b) and 4(b), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1901 (b) and 1903(b); 43 U.S.”
W. Watersheds Proj. v. Kraayenbrink, 538 F. Supp. 2d 1302 (D. Idaho 2008). “” See 43 U.S.C. § 1901 (a)(1). These poor conditions, Con *1306 gress found, contributed “significantly to unacceptable levels of siltation and salinity in major western watersheds; negatively impact[ed] the quality and availability of scarce western water supplies; [and]…”
Fallini v. Hodel, 725 F. Supp. 1113 (D. Nev. 1989). · cites it 2× “Congress enacted amendments to the Wild Horses Act in 1978 precisely because of its concern that “wild horses[’] numbers now exceed the carrying capacity of the range .”
Stout v. U.S. Forest Serv., 869 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (D. Or. 2012). “” 43 U.S.C. § 1901 (a)(6). “Excess animals” are defined as “wild free-roaming horses or burros (1) which have been removed from an area by the Secretary pursuant to applicable law or, (2) which must be removed from an area in order to preserve and maintain a thriving natural…”
Show all 15 citing cases →
43 U.S.C. § 1901(a)(5): 1 case
Fallini v. Hodel, 725 F. Supp. 1113 (D. Nev. 1989). “Congress enacted amendments to the Wild Horses Act in 1978 precisely because of its concern that “wild horses[’] numbers now exceed the carrying capacity of the range .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.