43 U.S.C. § 617m

Reclamation law applicable

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 43 CasesGoogle Scholar

This subchapter shall be deemed a supplement to the reclamation law, which said reclamation law shall govern the construction, operation, and management of the works herein authorized, except as otherwise therein provided.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1972–1978 · leading case: California v. United States, 438 U.S. 645 (1978).
California v. United States, 438 U.S. 645 (1978). · cites it 2× “[28] The Special Master agreed with the States that they had such power under § 14 of the Project Act, 43 U. S. C. § 617m, which incorporated the Reclamation Act of 1902, and § 18 of the Project Act, 43 U.”
Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. East Bay Mun. Util. Dist., 572 P.2d 1128 (Cal. 1977). · cites it 2× “Section 8 of the general reclamation law was made applicable through section 14 of the Boulder Canyon Project Act (43 U.S.C. § 617m) by incorporation by reference.”
United States v. Imperial Irrigation Dist., 559 F.2d 509 (9th Cir. 1977). · cites it 3× “43 U.S.C. § 617m. By the operation of Sections 12 and 14, the Project Act was incorporated into the framework of the reclamation laws, including Section 46, that had recently been considered by Congress and that had also been the subject of national concern for some time.”
Yellen v. Hickel, 352 F. Supp. 1300 (S.D. Cal. 1972). “1065 , 43 U.S.C.A. § 617m, the land limitation provisions of reclamation law are made applicable to the construction, operation and management of the works authorized under the Boulder Canyon Project Act, including the residency requirement of Section 5 of the Reclamation Act of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.