43 U.S.C. § 872
Conveyances to United States in connection with applications for amendment of patented entries or for exchange of land, etc.; withdrawal or rejection of applications; reconveyances
Where a conveyance of land has been made or may hereafter be made to the United States in connection with an application for amendment of a patented entry or entries, or an exchange of lands, or for any other purpose, and the application in connection with which the conveyance was made is thereafter withdrawn or rejected, the Secretary of the Interior or such officer as he may designate is authorized and directed, if the deed of conveyance has been recorded, to execute a quitclaim deed of the conveyed land to the party or parties entitled thereto.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1933–1987 · leading case: Newman v. Cornelius, 3 Cal. App. 3d 279 (Cal. Ct. App. 1970).
Newman v. Cornelius, 3 Cal. App. 3d 279 (Cal. Ct. App. 1970). “257 (1930), 43 U.S.C. § 872 .) The exchange initiated by Scofield in 1899 was never completed, i.”
Jay v. Dollarhide, 3 Cal. App. 3d 1001 (Cal. Ct. App. 1970). “257 ; 43 U.S.C.A. § 872 ), provided that: “Where a conveyance of land has been made or may hereafter be made to the United States in connection with an application for amendment of a patented entry or entries, for an exchange of lands, or for any other purpose, and the…”
Gendron v. United States, 402 F. Supp. 46 (E.D. Cal. 1974). “§ 483 ) and April 28, 1930 ( 43 U.S.C. § 872 ) to request a reconveyance of the land in question.”
Rosenberg v. C. W. Clarke Co., 200 Cal. App. 2d 178 (Cal. Ct. App. 1962). “) Congress enacted legislation which provided that after a conveyance of land had been made and recorded on the basis of an expected exchange of lands and the application in connection with which the conveyance was made was thereafter withdrawn or rejected, the commissioner…”
Lewis v. Hickel, 427 F.2d 673 (9th Cir. 1970). “Our conclusion that the Secretary has power to reject applications prior to issuance of the patents finds support in section 6 of the Act of April 28, 1930, as amended, 43 U.S.C. § 872 (1964). That section gives the Secretary authority to return base land deeded to the United…”
Soda Flat Co. v. Hodel, 670 F. Supp. 879 (E.D. Cal. 1987). “§ 483 ) and April 28, 1930 ( 43 U.S.C. § 872 ) to request a reconveyance of the land in question.”
Linn Land Co. v. Udall, 255 F. Supp. 382 (D. Or. 1966). “The Government urges that the rights acquired by Santa Fe were purely personal and that nothing in the Act contemplated the assignability of those rights.”
Bogan v. Hynes, 65 F.2d 524 (9th Cir. 1933). “257 , 43 USCA § 872). It is apparent from the pleadings, findings, and opinion of the trial court and the briefs on appeal that the basic issue between the parties is as to the effect of a deed made July 28, 1899, by the plaintiff as grantor to the United States government as…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.