Notes of Decisions
Jud. Watch, Inc. v. United States Secret Serv., 726 F.3d 208 (D.C. Cir. 2013).
· cites it 6× “5 The Secret Service refused each request, asserting that WAVES and ACR records are not “agency records” subject to FOIA, but rather are “Presidential records” subject to the more restrictive disclosure regime established by the Presidential Records Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201…”
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. Cheney, 593 F. Supp. 2d 194 (D.D.C. 2009).
· cites it 8× “Plaintiffs’ claims implicate the Presidential Record Act (“PRA” or “the Act”), 44 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq., which Congress enacted following a controversy surrounding President Richard M.”
Doyle v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 331 F. Supp. 3d 27 (S.D. Ill. 2018).
· cites it 5× “§§ 2102 - 2118, 2901 - 2910, 3101 - 3107, 3301 - 3324, and the Presidential Records Act ("PRA"), 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201 - 2209 ; it seeks injunctive relief and, under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.”
Richard Nixon v. United States, 978 F.2d 1269 (D.C. Cir. 1992).
· cites it 4× “By all accounts, before the Presidential Records Act of 1978, 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201 et seq., Presidents were never subject to any such specific, express legal duty to create or maintain their papers.”
Scott Armstrong v. Exec. Off. of the President, 90 F.3d 553 (D.C. Cir. 1996).
· cites it 4× “* The Presidential Records Act, 44 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq., which applies to most NSC documents, provides in part that a president’s records are to be made publicly available five years after he leaves office, except that national defense and certain other information is to be…”
Am. Immigr. Lawyers Ass'n v. Exec. Off. for Immigr. Review, 830 F.3d 667 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
“§ 552a(a)(4) (defining “record” under the Privacy Act as “any item, collection, or grouping of information”); 44 U.S.C. § 2201 (2) (defining “Presidential records” as “documentary materials, or any reasonably segregable portion thereof,” meeting certain criteria); id.”
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. Trump, 302 F. Supp. 3d 127 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
· cites it 2× “The Presidential Records Act and the Federal Records Act The creation, management, and disposal of records by the federal government is controlled by two key statutes: the Presidential Records Act and the Federal Records Act.”
Armstrong v. Exec. Off. of the President, 877 F. Supp. 690 (D.D.C. 1995).
· cites it 5× “See 44 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq. When faced with two statutes, the general rule is that a repeal by implication is dis-favored.”
Am. Historical Ass'n v. Peterson, 876 F. Supp. 1300 (D.D.C. 1995).
· cites it 4× “The materials transferred include “Presidential records,” as that term is defined in 44 U.S.C. § 2201 (2). The Presidential records on the tapes were generated by individuals in the White House Office and the Office of Policy Development, as well as in other offices and…”
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. Cheney, 577 F. Supp. 2d 328 (D.D.C. 2008).
· cites it 8× “Plaintiffs allege that Vice President Cheney, the OVP, and the EOP have improperly excluded records from the Presidential Records Act, 44 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq. (“PRA”), and seek a declaratory judgment or alternatively a writ of mandamus based on those allegations.”
Donald Trump v. Bennie Thompson, 20 F. 4th 10 (D.C. Cir. 2021).
“The information sought pertains to the activities of former President Trump and White House staff in “carrying out the * * * duties of the President” on and around January 6, and those records are exclusively within the control of the Archivist, 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201 (2), 2202. For…”
44 U.S.C. § 2201(2): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.