44 U.S.C. § 307
Director of the Government Publishing Office: night work
The Director of the Government Publishing Office shall cause the public printing in the Government Publishing Office to be done at night as well as through the day, when the exigencies of the public service require it.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 74
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1942–2025 · leading case: Yakus v. United States, 321 U.S. 414 (1944).
Yakus v. United States, 321 U.S. 414 (1944). “Petitioners have not contended that they were unaware of the Regulation and the jury found that they knowingly violated it within eight days after its issue.”
Fed. Crop Ins. Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380 (1947). “502 , 44 U.S.C. § 307 . Accordingly, the Wheat Crop Insurance Regulations were binding on all who sought to come within the Federal Crop Insurance Act, regardless of actual knowledge of what is in the Regulations or of the hardship resulting from innocent ignorance.”
United States v. Daahir Caseer, 399 F.3d 828 (6th Cir. 2005). “However, “Supplementary Information” accompanying an agency rule is separate from the text of the rule itself *839 and is not codified in the Code of Federal Regulations. Hence, publication of the “Supplementary Information” in the Federal Register does not furnish notice…”
Jackson v. United States, 216 Ct. Cl. 25 (Ct. Cl. 1978). “See § 516 (b), 52 Stat 72,77,c 30, 7 USCA § 1516 (b), 2 FCA title 7, § 1516 (b). Just as everyone is charged with knowledge of the United States Statutes at Large, Congress has provided that the appearance of rules and regulations in the Federal Register gives legal notice of…”
State v. Leyshon, 710 S.E.2d 282 (N.C. Ct. App. 2011). “The contents of the Federal Register must be judicially noticed, 44 U.S.C.A. § 307 . Periodically these regulations are codified and published as Code of Federal Regulations (C.”
United States v. Schneiderman, 106 F. Supp. 731 (S.D. Cal. 1952). “415 ; 44 U.S.C.A. § 307 . And having been held to constitute a valid exercise by the Attorney General of his authority under 5 U.”
Robert v. Ferry v. Stewart L. Udall, Sec'y of the Interior, Autrice Copeland Freeman v. Stewart L. Udall, Sec'y of the Interior, 336 F.2d 706 (9th Cir. 1964). “Both appellants argue that these regulations do not apply to them since the public notice did not call their attention to the fact that the auction was being held pursuant to 43 C.”
Kempe v. United States, 151 F.2d 680 (8th Cir. 1945). “88, since both of these regulations had been published in the Federal Register and the volume and page were set forth in the information.”
Zimmerman v. Walker, 132 F.2d 442 (9th Cir. 1942). “7 of the Federal Register Act of 1935, 44 U.S. C.A. § 307. [6] "The governor shall be responsible for the faithful execution of the laws of the United States and of the Territory of Hawaii within the said Territory, and whenever it becomes necessary he may call upon the…”
Evelyn Elisabeth Kirkhuff v. Robert P. Nimmo, Adm'r, Vets. Affairs, 683 F.2d 544 (D.C. Cir. 1982). “502 , 44 U.S.C. § 307 .”). 9 . Many V.A. hospitals lack facilities for providing care to female patients.”
United States v. Roger Aarons & Robert Swann, 310 F.2d 341 (2d Cir. 1962). “The only explicit sanction in the FRA is the provision in § 7, 44 U.S.C. § 307 , that “no document required under section 305(a) of this title to be published in the Federal Register shall be valid as against any person who has not had actual knowledge thereof until the…”
Lindsay B. Shafer, Lewis Shafer, Joseph Shafer, & Lewis Shafer, Sr. v. United States, 229 F.2d 124 (4th Cir. 1956). “See 44 U.S.C.A. § 307 . The Secretary of Agriculture was not a necessary party to the suit as claimed by the appellants.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.