45 U.S.C. § 16
Repealed. Pub. L. 103–272, § 7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1930–1969 · leading case: Penn Cent. Co. v. Dep't of Pub. Utils., 356 Mass. 478 (Mass. 1969).
Penn Cent. Co. v. Dep't of Pub. Utils., 356 Mass. 478 (Mass. 1969). “See 45 U. S. C. § 16 (1964). In general these pro *482 visions relate to specific safety devices.”
The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. v. Daniel T. Jackson, 233 F.2d 660 (D.C. Cir. 1956). “’ “The provisions of sections 11-16 of this title, as to the equipment of cars with the designated safety appliances apply to every common carrier and every vehicle subject to what are commonly known as the ‘Safety Appliance Acts’ set out in sections 1—10 of this title.”
United States v. Chicago, St. P., M. &. O. Ry. Co., 43 F.2d 300 (8th Cir. 1930). “” By its order of March 13, 1911, it is specifically provided that “hand brakes will not be required on locomotives, nor on tenders when attached to locomotives.” In an-opinion by District Judge Luse in United States v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.