U.S. Code » Title 45 » Chapter CHAPTER 9— RETIREMENT OF RAILROAD EMPLOYEES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER IV— RAILROAD RETIREMENT ACT OF 1974

45 U.S.C. § 231g

Court jurisdiction

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 45 CasesGoogle Scholar

Decisions of the Board determining the rights or liabilities of any person under this subchapter shall be subject to judicial review in the same manner, subject to the same limitations, and all provisions of law shall apply in the same manner as though the decision were a determination of corresponding rights or liabilities under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act [45 U.S.C. 351 et seq.] except that the time within which proceedings for the review of a decision with respect to an annuity, supplemental annuity, or lump-sum benefit may be commenced shall be one year after the decision will have been entered upon the records of the Board and communicated to the claimant.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 73 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: Salinas v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 592 U.S. 188 (2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Salinas v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 592 U.S. 188 (2021). · cites it 6× “See 45 U. S. C. §231g. Thus, to qualify for judicial review, the Board’s refusal to reopen Salinas’ 2006 application must constitute “any final decision of the Board.”
Mary Ann Kelly v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 625 F.2d 486 (3rd Cir. 1980). · cites it 3× “45 U.S.C. § 231g (1976). 4 Kelly presses two grounds for reversal: (1) that the agency violated her 5th amendment right to due process in that it committed serious procedural errors in its internal appeals procedures; (2) that the agency decision, finding her not under a…”
Clinton T. Frock & Charles L. Stribling v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 685 F.2d 1041 (7th Cir. 1982). · cites it 4× “See 45 U.S.C. § 231g. Frock then filed a Petition for Review with this court on July 27, 1981.”
James E. Steebe v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 708 F.2d 250 (7th Cir. 1983). · cites it 3× “on under this subchapter shall be subject to judicial review in the same manner, subject to the same limitations, and all provisions of law shall apply in the same manner as though the decision were a determination of corresponding rights or liabilities under the Railroad…”
Alfred L. Jacques v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., & the United States Gov't, 736 F.2d 34 (2d Cir. 1984). · cites it 2× “Jacques now petitions for review of the decision of the Board, pursuant to 45 U.S.C. § 231g. II. We first consider the proper scope of judicial review in this case.”
Stovic v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 826 F.3d 500 (D.C. Cir. 2016). “45 U.S.C. § 231g. In turn, Section 5(f) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act sets forth the following conditions on judicial review: “Any claimant, or any railway labor organization organized in accordance with the provisions of the Railway Labor Act [45 U.”
Ry. Labor Executives' Ass'n v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 749 F.2d 856 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “WALD, Circuit Judge: The Railway Labor Executives’ Association (“RLEA”) seeks review, pursuant to 45 U.S.C. §§ 231g and 355(f), of a decision of the Railroad Retirement Board (“the Board”) which determined that Canadian employees of United States railroads operating in Canada…”
Alberta E. Burns, on Behalf of Herself & All Others Similarly Situated v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 701 F.2d 193 (D.C. Cir. 1983). · cites it 2× “As authorized by 45 U.S.C. §§ 231g, 355(f), she now petitions this court to review the Board’s December 11, 1980, decision rejecting her claim for recovery of the $700 deducted from her 1978 benefits.”
Nancy Johnson v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 969 F.2d 1082 (D.C. Cir. 1992). “Decisions of the Board must be reviewed according to the terms of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974, 45 U.S.C. § 231g (1988). The relevant section, “Claims for benefits,” says that *1085 [findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Board in the determination of any claim…”
R.R. Concrete Crosstie Corp. v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 709 F.2d 1404 (11th Cir. 1983). “45 U.S.C.A. § 231g incorporates by reference the review provisions of the RUIA, 45 U.”
Herzog Transit Servs., Inc. v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 624 F.3d 467 (7th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “" 45 U.S.C. § 231g; 45 U.S.C. § 355 (f). B.”
Arthur R. Roberts v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 346 F.3d 139 (5th Cir. 2003). “45 U.S.C. § 231g (incorporating the RUIA, 45 U.”
Show all 73 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.